What a bowl of ramen says about a city

At a ramen bar in Bengaluru recently, I noticed something odd. Nobody in the 20-person queue was treating it like an event. Not the teens in pyjamas, not the techies in hoodies, not the linen-clad aunties waiting patiently for their gyoza and miso broth which would be sold out by 9pm. There were no Instagram poses. No wide-eyed awe. Just dinner.

And that’s the point.

Ramen, once a flex, a foreign curiosity, a proxy for travel and taste, is now comfort food. Quietly, without fanfare, it has become the kind of dish people reach for when they don’t want to think too hard. And that tells you something surprisingly deep about a city.
Because food isn’t just a cultural marker. It’s a lagging indicator — not of what we aspire to, but of what we finally have the emotional infrastructure to desire. You crave sushi not when you’re striving, but when your life has settled enough to make space for gentler hunger, for subtlety.

Back in 2018, I had my first bowl of ramen. I’d just moved to Delhi — my first time living in a metro — and one of my well-travelled uncles (every family has one) took me to a Japanese restaurant. I didn’t understand half the menu. Sushi felt intimidating. Ramen felt like a ceremony. At the time, Domino’s defined Italian. Indian-Chinese was just…Chinese.

Cut to a few years later: my nine-year-old niece slurps tonkotsu ramen like it’s Maggi. No performance. No reverence. Just lunch. That’s what has changed. What was once a marker of access is now a Rs 380 combo meal on Swiggy, rated 4.6 by 16K+ people from your neighbourhood.

And that shift is not just about taste, it’s about timing.

In early-stage cities — chaotic, crowded, perpetually under construction — food is functional. It fills, it hits, it comforts. You want spice. You want oil. You want guaranteed dopamine. When the world outside is unpredictable, you want your food to be predictable.

But when a city begins to grow up, when incomes stabilise, and public infrastructure stops actively overwhelming you, the menu changes. Broth replaces gravy. Cold noodles push out fried rice. Sushi, once too raw and too unsure, suddenly makes emotional sense. Not because it’s tastier but because it’s cleaner. Controlled. Low-friction.

Sushi didn’t win globally by being the most flavourful thing on the table. It won because it matched the emotional tempo of modern urban life. Ramen, too: neat toppings, a broth you can customise, no risk of surprise. It looks like control. Like restraint. Like something that won’t betray you.

Which, when you think about it, is exactly what a grown-up city craves. But this isn’t just about comfort. It’s also about freedom.
A decade ago, global food in India was a status symbol. You didn’t just eat sushi — you earned it. It lived in five-star hotels and curated food blogs, ordered by people who had “discovered it in Singapore” or “did a semester in the US.” To eat Japanese or Korean in 2013 was to signal cosmopolitanism.

Today? It’s in food courts, food delivery apps, and cloud kitchens. Teenagers order gimbap with Coke. And this transformation isn’t just about rising incomes, it’s about urban anonymity.

You see, Indian food culture used to be deeply communal, and therefore deeply policed. What you ate was what your family, caste, or region allowed. Asking for Thai curry instead of rajma wasn’t just a preference, it was betrayal. Taste wasn’t private. It was inherited.

Cities broke that.

But there’s something else at play too, something uniquely urban, and uniquely Indian.

Metros like Bengaluru, Delhi, and Mumbai aren’t just cities that have grown up. They’re cities that have been constantly reassembled. People arrive here from Bhilai, Kochi, Ranchi, Guwahati — each with their own food rules, their own definitions of what counts as ‘normal’. And when you stack that much difference into a 2 BHK rental economy, something quietly radical happens: no one’s culture dominates. Everyone is adapting, translating, borrowing. That’s what makes metros such fertile ground for culinary experimentation. Not just money or exposure, but the absence of a single script. You’re allowed to try, tweak, remix, because the rules are already in flux.

The ramen queue isn’t full of connoisseurs. It’s full of people quietly conducting micro-experiments: ordering dishes their grandparents wouldn’t recognise, discovering their own palate without needing anyone else to validate it. No flex. No fear. Just play.

Ramen isn’t just a dish; it’s a sign that the city’s palate has stopped performing. That we are no longer eating to impress but eating to explore. And if we keep going this way — yes, it could show up inside a dosa, drizzled with wasabi mayo, and rebranded as ‘Bombay Bae-men’. Or butter-chicken miso chowmein might show up. But so might something rarer: the freedom to not care if it makes sense. Because when food stops being about performance, it becomes a playground.

END OF ARTICLE