Connect with us

WORLD

Donald Trump’s campus crackdown hits Harvard university – and it’s just the beginning – The Times of India

Published

on

Donald Trump’s campus crackdown hits Harvard university – and it’s just the beginning – The Times of India


File photo: Harvard University campus. (Sophie Park/The New York Times)

In early April, US President Donald Trump asked a simple, incendiary question in a private White House lunch: “What if we never pay them?” The “them” was Harvard University, and the “pay” was $9 billion in federal grants. As per a New York Times report, Trump’s question was not rhetorical. Two weeks later, $2.2 billion in Harvard’s federal funding was frozen.
Driving the news
Harvard University — America’s oldest, richest, and most powerful college — is in open conflict with the White House after rejecting a sweeping set of demands from President Donald Trump’s administration aimed at remaking elite higher education in its ideological image.
The immediate fallout: The Trump administration froze $2.2 billion in federal grants and contracts, escalating a battle that some in academia are calling the biggest federal challenge to university independence in decades.
Harvard President Alan Garber made the university’s position clear in a public letter: “The University will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.”

Neither Harvard nor any other private university can allow itself to be taken over by the federal government. Accordingly, Harvard will not accept the government’s terms as an agreement in principle.

Harvard’s response to the Trump administration

Zoom in: Trump admin’s demands

By August 2025, the University must adopt and implement merit-based admissions policies and cease all preferences based on race, color, national origin, or proxies thereof, throughout its undergraduate program, each graduate program individually, each of its professional schools, and other programs. Such adoption and implementation must be durable and demonstrated through structural and personnel changes. All admissions data shall be shared with the federal government and subjected to a comprehensive audit by the federal government.

Trump administration’s letter to Harvard

Trump’s assault on higher education is not new — but it’s never looked like this before. Backed by a task force to combat antisemitism, Trump’s team is leveraging federal research dollars to force ideological reforms on elite universities. These include:

  • Eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs
  • Instituting “merit-based” admissions and hiring policies
  • Conducting audits of ideological bias among students and faculty
  • Banning student groups deemed hostile to Jewish students or accused of “illegal harassment”
  • Stopping recognition of protest groups and even banning protest-related face coverings

This follows months of intense campus protests over Israel’s war in Gaza, many of which involved pro-Palestinian student groups that clashed with police and drew accusations of antisemitic rhetoric.
While Columbia University accepted similar terms under threat of losing $400 million, Harvard refused — becoming the administration’s top target.
Harvard’s stance
In a letter sent by powerhouse law firms Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and King & Spalding, Harvard made its position plain: “Harvard remains open to dialogue about what the university has done, and is planning to do, to improve the experience of every member of its community. But Harvard is not prepared to agree to demands that go beyond the lawful authority of this or any administration.”
President Garber noted that while Harvard has made “lasting and robust” reforms to combat antisemitism — including placing the Palestine Solidarity Committee on probation and severing ties with Birzeit University in the West Bank — most of the administration’s demands veer far beyond those goals.
“Although some of the demands outlined by the government are aimed at combating antisemitism, the majority represent direct governmental regulation of the ‘intellectual conditions’ at Harvard,” Garber wrote.
Endowment rich, cash poor: Why Harvard can’t just write a check

  • Locked funds: 70% of Harvard’s endowment is restricted by donor terms—earmarked for specific programs and untouchable for general use.
  • Limited flexibility: Only about 20% of funds are discretionary, and even those often come with strings attached to schools or initiatives.
  • Federal funding still matters: Federal money makes up around 16% of Harvard’s operating budget—nearly $700 million a year.
  • Operational strain: Harvard has already implemented a hiring freeze and tapped the bond market for $450 million, signs the pressure is real.
  • Funding is not fungible: Endowment funds can’t simply be rerouted to cover research losses or frozen grants.
  • Political risk, not financial alone: The threat isn’t just about money—it’s about control, precedent, and Harvard’s ability to govern itself.

What they’re saying
The response has split starkly along partisan and ideological lines.
Support for Harvard

  • “I’ve never seen this degree of government intrusion, encroachment into academic decision-making — nothing like this,” Lee C Bollinger, former Columbia’s president, told the NYT.
  • Massachusetts governor Maura Healey praised the university for “standing up for education and freedom by standing against the Trump Administration’s brazen attempt to bully schools.”
  • Former Harvard president Larry Summers called it “the right stand.”
  • Alumni and faculty rallied, with a group filing suit arguing the administration violated due process and academic freedom.
  • Anurima Bhargava, a Harvard alum and civil rights advocate, said: “Harvard reminded the world that learning, innovation and transformative growth will not yield to bullying and authoritarian whims.”

Attacks from the right

  • Rep Elise Stefanik (R-NY): “It’s time to totally cut off US taxpayer funding to this institution that has failed to live up to its founding motto, Veritas.”
  • The Trump administration’s antisemitism task force accused Harvard of exhibiting a “troubling entitlement mindset.”
  • Conservative activist Christopher Rufo said told NYT: “We want to set them back a generation or two.”

A cultural counteroffensive
The Trump administration’s playbook is both aggressive and improvisational. It began with Columbia University, which conceded to federal demands after $400 million in funding was cut. Since then, the administration has partially or fully suspended research funding at Princeton, Cornell, Northwestern, Brown, and the University of Pennsylvania. The approach has been coordinated through an opaque and ideologically hardline group in Washington.
As per the NYT report, Stephen Miller, Trump’s deputy chief of staff for policy, and activist Christopher Rufo have reportedly advocated for using financial pressure to “set them [elite universities] back a generation or two.” The broader strategy? Redefine civil rights enforcement as a mechanism to crush progressive influence in academia.
The administration argues that it’s responding to unchecked antisemitism on campus. But the demands go far beyond that. They include ideological audits of departments, bans on face coverings (seen as a rebuke to pro-Palestinian protesters), and the disbanding of student groups deemed politically unacceptable.
“This isn’t about antisemitism anymore,” Garber wrote. “The majority [of demands] represent direct governmental regulation of the ‘intellectual conditions’ at Harvard.”
The administration sees things differently. “Harvard’s statement today reinforces the troubling entitlement mindset,” the task force wrote in response to the university’s defiance. “The harassment of Jewish students is intolerable.”
Catch up quick: Trump’s crackdown so far

  • Columbia: Lost $400m, agreed to policy changes.
  • Penn: Lost $175m, in part over support for a transgender athlete.
  • Princeton, Northwestern, Cornell, Brown: Contracts frozen.
  • Harvard: Facing the largest threat – a potential $9B loss in total funding.
  • The Department of Education has opened investigations into 60 universities, signaling this is only the beginning.

What’s next
Harvard is already tightening its belt:

  • Imposed a hiring freeze in March
  • Reentered the bond market, raising $450 million in tax-exempt debt
  • Monitoring donor fallout, after gifts fell more than $150 million in the last fiscal year

But donor intent laws limit how much of the endowment can be reallocated to plug federal shortfalls. A university source told Axios that Harvard can only “maneuver around the margins” of the budget without triggering legal or reputational blowback.
Meanwhile, lawsuits from Harvard faculty and allies argue that the administration’s actions violate Title VI and the First Amendment, and fail to follow required legal procedures for cutting federal funds.
The bottom line
Harvard may survive – but it won’t escape unchanged. The university’s endowment is not a silver bullet. The fight with Trump is forcing Harvard into uncomfortable trade-offs, strategic cutbacks, and public political warfare rarely seen from the ivory tower.
(With inputs from agencies)





Source link

WORLD

Pope Francis funeral details: Date, time, attendees, and more

Published

on


Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin, left, prays in front of the body of Pope Francis laid out in state inside his private chapel at the Vatican.
| Photo Credit: AP

Pope Francis’s funeral will be held on Saturday (April 26, 2025), as many world leaders will attend to honour the Catholic leader. The Argentine pontiff, 88, died on Monday (April 21, 2025) after a stroke, less than a month after returning home from five weeks in hospital battling double pneumonia.

Here’s what we know about the funeral of Pope Francis.

When is the funeral of Pope Francis?

Pope Francis’ funeral, which is expected to draw huge crowds, will take place at 10:00 am local time (1.30 pm IST) on April 26. The funeral date was set by cardinals meeting in a so-called “general congregation”, the first of a series of meetings which will culminate in a conclave within three weeks, where a new pope will be elected.


Also read | Many firsts of Pope Francis

Where will the funeral of Pope Francis be held?

The funeral of Pope Francis will be held in the majestic Baroque plaza in front of St Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican, six days after his death.

Where will Pope Francis be buried?

Pope Francis has asked to be buried in St Mary Major, a Roman basilica he was particularly attached to, rather than St Peter’s like many of his predecessors, with a simple inscription of his name in Latin, Franciscus. In his will, Pope Francis called for his tomb to be “in the ground; simple, without particular decoration, and with the sole inscription: Franciscus,’’ or Latin for Francis.

Where is Pope Francis’ body now?

Pope Francis is currently lying in state in the Santa Marta Domus in a private viewing for Vatican residents and the papal household. His body, lying in an open casket, will be taken from the chapel of the Vatican residence where he lived to St Peter’s, entering through the central door, in a grand procession on April 23, with cardinals and Latin chants. His body will lie in state for three days.

Once in St. Peter’s, his casket will not be put on an elevated bier — as was the case with past popes — but will just be placed simply facing the pews, with the Paschal candle nearby. Tens of thousands of mourners are expected to pay their respects to Pope Francis as he lies in state in St. Peter’s Basilica.

People gather in St Peter’s Square on the day of the translation of Pope Francis’ body, which will be transported inside the Basilica, at the Vatican.
| Photo Credit:
Reuters

Who will attend Pope Francis’ funeral?

Numerous world leaders have announced they will travel to Rome for Pope Francis’s funeral, which is expected to draw a huge crowd in the square in front of St Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican. U.S. President Donald Trump and his wife, Melania, will attend. Mr. Trump said in a social media post: “We look forward to being there!”

President Javier Milei of Argentina, where the pope was born in 1936, will attend, his office said. Brazil’s President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will attend with his wife Janja, his government said.

United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres will attend the funeral, his office said.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer will attend, and Prince William will also go to represent the head of state, King Charles III.

French President Emmanuel Macron, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Ireland’s President Michael Higgins, Spain’s King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia, Poland’s President Andrzej Duda, Belgium’s Prime Minister Bart De Wever, and Hungary’s President Tamas Sulyok will also attend the funeral among other European leaders.

From India, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin has announced that Minister for Minorities Welfare and Non Resident Tamils Welfare S.M. Nasar, along with DMK MLA from Tiruchi (East) Inigo.S. Irudayaraj, will attend the funeral service of Pope Francis, on behalf of Tamil Nadu government.

Who won’t attend Pope Francis’ funeral?

Russian leader Vladimir Putin, who is subject to an International Criminal Court arrest warrant over his invasion of Ukraine, will not attend the funeral of Pope Francis, the Kremlin said.

The Netherlands’ King Willem-Alexander and Queen Maxima — who also has Argentine nationality — will not make the trip due to the king’s birthday celebrations despite being “deeply moved” by Francis’s passing, the royal family said.

When will the next successor of Pope Francis be decided?

The cardinals haven’t set a date for the conclave to elect Pope Francis’ successor, but the current norms suggest it cannot begin before May 6. There is no clear frontrunner to succeed Francis, although British bookmakers have singled out Luis Antonio Tagle, a reformer from the Philippines, and Pietro Parolin, from Italy, as early favourites.

In the meantime, in the period known as the “sede vacante” (vacant seat) for the global Catholic Church, a cardinal known as the camerlengo (chamberlain), Irish-American Kevin Farrell, is in charge of ordinary affairs. Three cardinals were chosen to help the camerlengo, Cardinal Kevin Farrell, administer the Vatican during the “interregnum” period before the election of a new pope.



Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

Vietnam village starts over with climate defences after landslide | World News – The Times of India

Published

on


LAO CAI: Nguyen Thi Kim’s small verdant community in northern Vietnam no longer exists, wiped away in a landslide triggered by Typhoon Yagi’s devastating heavy rains last year.
She and dozens of survivors have been relocated to a site that authorities hope will withstand future climate change-linked disasters, with stronger homes, drainage canals and a gentler topography that lessens landslide risks.
It is an example of the challenges communities around the world face in adapting to climate change, including more intense rains and flash floods like those Typhoon Yagi brought last September.
Kim lost 14 relatives and her traditional timber stilt home when Yagi’s rains unleashed a landslide that engulfed much of Lang Nu village in mountainous Lao Cai province.
The storm was the strongest to hit Vietnam in decades, killing at least 320 people in the country and causing an estimated $1.6 billion in economic losses.
It is unlikely to be an outlier though, with research last year showing climate change is causing typhoons in the region to intensify faster and last longer over land.
Climate change, caused largely by burning fossil fuels, impacts typhoons in multiple ways: a warmer atmosphere holds more water, making for heavier rains, and warmer oceans also help fuel tropical storms.
Kim remains traumatised by the landslide.
She says everything is painful, especially the memory of the moment a torrent of mud swept away her and her two-year-old daughter.
“This disaster was too big for us all,” she said recalling the moment the pair were pulled from the mud hours later.
“I still cannot talk about it without crying. I can’t forget,” the 28-year-old told AFP.
‘We need to change’
Yagi hit Vietnam with winds in excess of 149 kilometres (92 miles) per hour and brought a deluge of rain that caused destructive flooding in parts of Laos, Thailand and Myanmar.
In Lang Nu, 67 residents were killed, and authorities vowed to rebuild the homes of survivors in a safe spot.
By December, 40 new houses were ready at a site around two kilometres away.
It was chosen for its elevation, which should be less impacted by adjacent streams, and its relatively gentle slope gradient.
“Predicting absolute safety in geology is actually very difficult,” said Tran Thanh Hai, rector of Hanoi University of Geology and Mining, who was involved in choosing a new site.
But the site is secure, “to the best of our knowledge and understanding”.
Lao Cai is one of Vietnam’s poorest areas, with little money for expensive warning systems.
However, a simple drainage system runs through the new community, diverting water away from the slope.
This should reduce soil saturation and the chances of another landslide, scientists who worked on the site told AFP.
The village’s new homes are all built of sturdier concrete, rather than traditional wood.
“We want to follow our traditions, but if it’s not safe any longer, we need to change,” Kim said, staring out at the expanse of mud and rock where her old village once stood.
Months later it remains frozen in time, strewn with children’s toys, kitchen pans and motorcycle helmets caught up in the landslide.
‘Safest ground for us’
Like Kim, 41-year-old Hoang Thi Bay now lives in the new village in a modern stilt house with steel structural beams.
Her roof, once made of palm leaves, is now corrugated iron and her doors are aluminium glass.
She survived the landslide by clinging desperately to the single concrete pillar in her old home as a wall of mud and rocks swept her neighbourhood away.
“I still wake up in the night obsessing over what happened,” she told AFP.
“Our old house was bigger and nicer, with gardens and fields. But I sleep here in the new house and I feel much safer,” she said.
Even at the new site, home to around 70 people, there are risks, warned Hai.
Development that changes the slope’s gradient, or construction of dams or reservoirs in the area could make the region more landslide-prone, he said.
Building more houses or new roads in the immediate area, or losing protective forest cover that holds earth in place, could also make the site unsafe, added Do Minh Duc, a professor at the Institute of Geotechnics and Environment at the Vietnam National University in Hanoi.
Yagi wiped out large areas of mature natural forest in Lao Cai and while private companies have donated trees for planting, it is unclear whether they can provide much protection.
“In terms of landslide prevention, the only forest that can have good (protective) effects is rainforest with a very high density of trees, so-called primary forest,” explained Duc, an expert on disaster risk maps who also helped choose the new site.
Leaving the old community was hard for Kim, whose family had lived and farmed there for nearly half a century.
But she is grateful that she and other survivors have a second chance.
“I believe this is the safest ground for us.”





Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

Israeli military says it ‘most likely’ intercepted missile coming from Yemen

Published

on


The Israeli military said it “most likely” intercepted a missile launched from Yemen early on Wednesday (April 23, 2025), following alarms that sounded in several areas in Israel.

Israel’s national ambulance service Magen David Adom (MDA) said that no calls have been received regarding rocket impacts or casualties.

The Iran-backed Houthi movement, an armed group that has taken control of the most populous parts of Yemen, has been launching missiles and drones at Israel in solidarity with Palestinians over Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version