Connect with us

WORLD

UNSC begins closed door consultations on situation between India, Pakistan

Published

on

UNSC begins closed door consultations on situation between India, Pakistan


The UN Security Council commenced closed-door consultations on the situation between India and Pakistan, hours after Secretary General Antonio Guterres voiced concern over tensions between the nuclear-armed neighbours being “at their highest in years”.

Pakistan, currently a non-permanent member of the powerful 15-nation Security Council, had requested for “closed consultations” on the situation.

The closed-door meeting will not take place in the UNSC Chamber where Council members sit at the powerful horse-shoe table but in a consultations room next to the chamber.

Follow Pahalgam attack updates: May 5, 2025

Assistant Secretary-General for Middle East, Asia and the Pacific in the Departments of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs and Peace Operations Khaled Mohamed Khiari of Tunisia will brief the Council on behalf of both departments (DPPA and DPO).

Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations Ambassador Asim Iftikhar Ahmad could brief reporters after the meeting.

Just hours before the closed consultations, Mr. Guterres voiced concern over tensions between India and Pakistan being at “their highest in years”, saying “it pains me to see relations reaching a boiling point”.

Mr. Guterres made remarks to the press from the UNSC stake-out Monday morning amid rising tensions between the neighbours following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir that killed 26 civilians, including a Nepali citizen.

Mr. Guterres said he understands the “raw feelings” following the “awful terror attack” in Pahalgam and reiterated his strong condemnation of that attack, extending his condolences to the families of the victims. “Targeting civilians is unacceptable – and those responsible must be brought to justice through credible and lawful means,” he said.

He stressed that it is essential – especially at this critical hour — to avoid a military confrontation that could easily spin out of control. “Now is the time for maximum restraint and stepping back from the brink. That has been my message in my ongoing outreach with both countries. Make no mistake: A military solution is no solution,” the UN chief said.


Also read | UN chief offers to help in ‘de-escalation’, ‘resumption of dialogue’

He reiterated that he offers his good offices to both governments in the service of peace. “The United Nations stands ready to support any initiative that promotes de-escalation, diplomacy, and a renewed commitment to peace.”

Apart from the five veto-wielding permanent members — China, France, Russia, U.K. and the U.S. — the 10 non-permanent members in the Council are Algeria, Denmark, Greece, Guyana, Pakistan, Panama, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and Somalia.

India’s former Permanent Representative to the U.N. Ambassador Syed Akbaruddin told PTI that no “consequential outcome” can be expected from “a discussion where a party to the conflict seeks to shape perceptions by using its membership of the Council. India will parry such Pakistani efforts”.

In August 2019, China had requested closed UNSC consultations to discuss India’s move to revoke the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.

That meeting had ended without any outcome or statement from the powerful 15-nation U.N. organ, dealing a huge snub to Pakistan’s efforts, backed by Beijing, to internationalise the Kashmir issue, which an overwhelming majority in the Council stressed is a bilateral matter between New Delhi and Islamabad.

Mr. Akbaruddin, who was India’s top diplomat to the U.N. headquarters in New York during the time, had said following the August 2019 meeting that India’s national position was and remains that matters related to Article 370 of the Indian Constitution “are entirely an internal matter of India. These have no external ramifications”.

Also read | Pahalgam attack: UN chief Antonio Guterres urges India, Pakistan to exercise ‘maximum restraint’

On the UNSC closed consultations Monday, India’s former Permanent Representative to the U.N. Ambassador T.S. Tirumurti told PTI that “predictably, Pakistan has taken advantage of the dastardly terror act sponsored by them in Pahalgam to raise the bogey of a nuclear flare-up and agitate the issue of Jammu and Kashmir in the UN Security Council”.

“Fortunately, this will not receive traction with the P-5, with the exception of China, since they treat this as a bilateral matter between India and Pakistan,” he said.

Mr. Tirumurti added that even if UNSC member states do not usually prevent closed consultations if requested, no outcome is expected. He helmed India’s Permanent Mission to the U.N. from May 2020 to June 2022, during the country’s 2021-22 tenure in the Security Council as a non-permanent member.

Also read | Pakistan to brief U.N. Security Council on India’s ‘aggressive actions’: Pak Foreign Office

In the weeks following the Pahalgam terror attack, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar spoke with all Council members, with the exception of China and Pakistan.

In his calls, Mr. Jaishankar underlined that “its perpetrators, backers and planners must be brought to justice”.

Mr. Jaishankar had a “good conversation” with Greek Foreign Minister George Gerapetritis and had “discussed the Pahalgam terrorist attack”. “India had welcomed Greece’s firm opposition to cross-border terrorism and “our Strategic Partnership reflects the depth of our ties,” Mr. Jaishankar had said.

Last week, Mr. Guterres reiterated his condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack in a call with Mr. Jaishankar, noting the importance of pursuing justice and accountability for these attacks through lawful means while voicing deep concern at rising tensions between India and Pakistan.

Mr. Guterres spoke separately with Jaishankar and Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.

“In his phone calls, the Secretary General reiterated his strong condemnation of the April 22 terrorist attack that took place in Jammu and Kashmir. The Secretary General noted the importance of pursuing justice and accountability for these attacks through lawful means,” Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesman for the Secretary-General, had said.





Source link

WORLD

Scripps National Spelling Bee tweaks its rules to make ‘spell-off’ tiebreaker less likely | World News – Times of India

Published

on

Scripps National Spelling Bee tweaks its rules to make ‘spell-off’ tiebreaker less likely | World News – Times of India


Scripps National Spelling Bee tweaks its rules to make ‘spell-off’ tiebreaker less likely (Photo: AP)

The Scripps National Spelling Bee won’t be so quick to force spellers into a lightning-round tiebreaker to decide a champion this year, a shift that follows criticism of the abrupt ending to last year’s competition. Scripps has eliminated its requirement that the tiebreaker known as a “spell-off” be used when the bee finals are nearing the end of their two-hour broadcast window and a champion has not been decided. Instead, judges will have more discretion to let the bee play out, even if it runs into overtime. “We don’t have those constraints in place that will force us into a spell-off situation based on time. It takes a lot of pressure off of that moment,” Corrie Loeffler, the bee’s executive director, told The Associated Press. “We can keep going with regular competition, rather than saying, ‘It’s 9:50, we’re going to a spell-off.'” Last year, the top two spellers were tossed into the spell-off without even competing head-to-head in the traditional spelling bee format, a move that rankled former champions and other bee aficionados. Bruhat Soma, who said afterward that he practiced the tiebreaker every day for six months, easily defeated Faizan Zaki. Faizan returns for another crack at the title in this year’s bee, which begins May 27.“Once you reach a certain point in the finals, the drama is really in watching the spellers take on the dictionary word by word,” said Scott Remer, a prolific spelling coach who works with Faizan. “Traditionally, the idea behind the spelling bee has been that you use the information you’re given, you gather the clues, you process the information, you think about the word, and then you take all of that synthesis of information and you provide a spelling.The spell-off obviously tests a different set of skills.” The spell-off was first used in 2022. Harini Logan beat Vikram Raju during that contest, but only after the pair had a traditional, lengthy duel in which each misspelled four words. Dev Shah didn’t need a spell-off to win two years ago, and he was outspoken about the 2024 edition, saying, “I don’t think it was a good bee.” There was no tiebreaker throughout most of the 2010s, and the bee had co-champions in three straight years from 2014-16. Then came the infamous 2019 bee, which ended in an eight-way tie when Scripps ran out of words difficult enough to challenge an unusually strong group of competitors. The 2020 bee was canceled because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and it returned the next year under new leaders who made it clear they wanted a sole champion. Another rule change has already proven popular among the spelling community: the return of a written test during the preliminary rounds. Spellers who spell one word correctly and get one multiple-choice vocabulary question right on stage will then sit for a 40-question written test at the end of the first day. Results of that test will be used to pare the field to about 100 quarterfinalists – and Scripps will also use the test scores to gauge the strength of the remaining spellers and inform the difficulty of words used in subsequent rounds. Current and former spellers say the written test is a fairer way to move the competition along than doing everything at the microphone during lengthy rounds with wild variations in word difficulty. “I think having a written test as well as oral rounds allows for a better snapshot of a speller’s holistic skills,” Shah said. During the 2010s, a written test reduced the field to about 50 spellers, making it even higher-stakes. Scripps editorial director Molly Becker believes this version, with a “gentler cut,” strikes the right balance. “We’ve heard from spellers that we like the fairness of the test because they’re all being examined on the same exact words,” Becker said. “Also, the primary driver for bringing back the test is that the program can continue to grow with the number of spellers.”





Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

Yemen’s Sanaa airport ‘completely destroyed’ in Israeli strike, say officials – Times of India

Published

on

Yemen’s Sanaa airport ‘completely destroyed’ in Israeli strike, say officials – Times of India


An Israeli strike on Yemen’s Sanaa airport on Tuesday has led to its “complete destruction”, airport officials said. The Israeli warplanes struck the airport in the Houthi-controlled capital which came in response to a missile attack by the Iran-aligned Houthi rebels targeting Israel’s main airport.Residents reported power cuts in Sanaa and the Houthi-controlled port city of Hodeida after Israeli strikes hit three power stations in and around the capital, according to the rebels.Israel’s military announced it had rendered the airport “completely” inoperable by targeting runways and aircraft, with no immediate reports of casualties.The Huthis have vowed to respond saying that the “aggression will not pass without a response and Yemen will not be discouraged from its stance in support of Gaza”.Since the Gaza war began in October 2023, the Houthis have launched attacks on Israel and vessels in the Red Sea trade route, declaring their actions as support for the Palestinians.Israel has carried out two waves of airstrikes after a Houthi missile breached the perimeter of Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion International Airport for the first time on Sunday, leaving a large crater and injuring six people. According to Houthi officials, Israel’s initial retaliatory strikes on Monday targeted a cement factory and sites in Hodeida, killing four people and wounding 35 others.





Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

What is the India, U.K. Double Contribution Convention agreement?

Published

on

What is the India, U.K. Double Contribution Convention agreement?


Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a bilateral meeting with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer on the sidelines of the G20 Summit, in Rio de Janeiro. File
| Photo Credit: Reuters

India and the U.K. on Tuesday (May 6, 2025) announced the conclusion of negotiations for a social security pact, which would help avoid double contribution to social security funds by Indian professionals working for a limited period in Britain.

The announcement of the Double Contribution Convention agreement was made along with the free trade agreement between the two countries.

Presently, Indian professionals working for a limited period in Britain contribute to their social security funds, but are not able to get their benefits as they return once the projects are complete.

EXPLAINED | India’s proposed free trade agreement with the U.K.

It was a long-standing demand of Indian businesses operating in Britain to cut down on the additional cost burden associated with bringing in skilled Indian professionals on a short-term basis.

The compulsory National Insurance (NI) contributions of skilled Indian professionals in the U.K. on temporary visas remain an additional cost burden of about 500 British pounds per employee a year, over and above all other taxes and health surcharge paid towards the National Health Service (NHS), as per 2021 data.

Also Read | India committed to Free Trade Agreement with the U.K., says Modi

India has social security agreements with countries like Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, France, Denmark, South Korea, and the Netherlands.

Thus, Indians going abroad for employment are not required to contribute towards social security schemes in these countries.

They and their employers can continue with social security schemes run by the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) here in India while serving abroad.

Highlights of the India-U.K. free trade agreement

99% Indian exports to benefit from zero duty in U.K. market.

Indian import duty will be slashed, locking in reductions on 90% of tariff lines, 85% of these becoming fully tariff-free within a decade.

India reducing tariff for: whisky, medical devices, advanced machinery, and lamb, making U.K. exports more competitive

Goods with reduced import duties for Indian consumers: cosmetics, aerospace, lamb, medical devices, salmon, electrical machinery, soft drinks, chocolate and biscuits

Products with cheaper prices for British shoppers: clothes, footwear, and food products including frozen prawns

Automotive tariffs will go from over 100% to 10% under a quota

Three-year exemption from social security payments for Indian employees working in the U.K.

Export opportunities for labour-intensive sectors such as textiles, marine products, leather, footwear, sports goods and toys, gems and jewellery, engineering goods, auto parts and engines, and organic chemicals



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.