Connect with us

WORLD

Tahawwur Rana extradition case: What happens after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack accused lands in India?

Published

on

Tahawwur Rana extradition case: What happens after the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack accused lands in India?


Tahawwur Rana, one of the co-conspirators in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, is set to be extradited to India from the U.S. on Thursday (April 10, 2025).

Rana is being brought to India after his last-ditch attempt to evade extradition failed as the U.S. Supreme Court justices rejected his application.

According to officials, a multi-agency team had gone to the U.S. to bring him to India.

What is Rana accused of?

Tahawwur Rana is wanted by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for his role in the November 26, 2008 terror attack, in which 10 Pakistani terrorists laid a more than 60-hour siege to various iconic locations in the heart of Mumbai, including the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Taj Mahal Hotel, Nariman House and the Cama and Albless Hospital. A total of 166 people, including six Americans, were killed in the horrendous attack.

Rana, 64, is a Pakistan-born Canadian national and close associate of one of the main conspirators of the terror attacks, David Coleman Headley alias Daood Gilani, a U.S. citizen. He was accused of helping him and others located in Pakistan to assist terrorist organisation Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) in carrying out the Mumbai attacks.

In 2013, Tahawwur Rana was sentenced to 14 years in prison by the United States and will face trial in India after 17 years of the attacks that killed more than 166 people in 2008. 

U.S. authorities handed over custody of 64-year old Tahawwur Rana on Tuesday night (April 8, 2025) in California to a special team from the National Investigative Agency (NIA), who travelled to the U.S. to accompany him on board an Indian plane back to India. The sources said the plane is likely to land in New Delhi before Rana is transferred to custody and the trial process begins. 

Also read | Tahawwur Hussain Rana: In the terror web

What will happen next?

Upon arrival in India, Rana will be immediately escorted to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) headquarters for further questioning. Security has also been heightened outside Delhi’s Patiala House Court where Rana is expected to be produced on April 10 in front an NIA judge who will hear his case.

The Union Home Ministry said advocate Narender Mann will be the special public prosecutor for conducting trial and other matters related to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) case RC-04/2009/NIA/DLI (Mumbai attacks) for three years.

Apart from being accused in the 2009 Mumbai terror attack, Tahawwur Rana is also wanted for his role in plotting attacks on the National Defence College and Chabad House, the Jewish outreach centre in Mumbai.

Where will he be lodged?

Tahawwur Rana is likely to be housed in a high-security ward in Delhi’s Tihar Jail. All necessary preparations have been made in the jail, said prison sources.

Will this have an impact on Headley?

David Headley, who pleaded guilty to conspiring the Mumbai terror attacks, is currently serving 35 years in a U.S. prison after he was convicted by a US court in 2010.

While India continues to push for his extradition, U.S. authorities have refused, as Headley had immediately accepted responsibility and pleaded guilty to all charges.

When asked about the significance of Rana’s extradition to India, former Union Home Secretary G.K Pillai said, “He had a small role to play, more of a passive role in providing the legal cover for Headley to be able to come to India. His role was setting up the immigration office in Mumbai and employing Headley and it was during these trips that the latter identified the place of landing of the boat carrying the terrorists. He had done physical reconnaissance of all these places and passed on the information to the ISI.”



Source link

WORLD

Mourners furious as people take ‘ghoulish’ selfies with Pope’s body – The Times of India

Published

on


Until the funeral on Saturday, Pope’s body, dressed in papal vestments, will lie in state at St Peter’s Basilica.

As the public viewing of Pope Francis’s body began, mourners were interrupted by visitors who turned the occasion into a ghoulish photo-op. Some Instagrammers even smiled as they posed in front of the open casket. “People were being asked to put their selfie sticks away when they got to the front,” UK tourist Martin Gilsenan told the Mirror.
“There were also many people looking around and getting upset with those on the phones,” he said, with images showing others crowding around taking pics, despite being told not to..
“I found the mobile phones very distasteful,” added Gilsenan’s wife, Catherine. “I was very surprised there were photos.”
The casket was not put on an elevated bier as it was his request to not make it difficult for the people to pay their last respect to him.
Until the funeral on Saturday, his body, dressed in papal vestments, will lie in state at St Peter’s Basilica.
The funeral will take place on Saturday at 10 a.m. local time (4 a.m. Eastern) in St. Peter’s Square, the Vatican announced. A public funeral Mass will be held in front of St. Peter’s Basilica, presided over by Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, dean of the College of Cardinals.
The funeral will be more modest than rites for past pontiffs: Francis last year simplified the rules around papal funerals, with changes that include using only one wooden coffin instead of three.
After the Mass, Francis’ body will be interred in the Papal Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, where seven other popes are buried.
Francis wrote in his will that he wanted his “last earthly journey to end at this very ancient Marian shrine.” He requested a simple, undecorated tomb with only the inscription “Franciscus,” the Vatican said.
World leaders and Catholic worshippers from around the world will attend the funeral. Expected attendees include: President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine, President Javier Milei of Argentina and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of Brazil, the world’s largest Catholic country.





Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

U.K. lifts sanctions against some Syrian government agencies and media outlets

Published

on


A picture of Bashar al-Assad, damaged by bullets.
| Photo Credit: Reuters

The British government said Thursday it was lifting sanctions against a dozen Syrian entities, including government departments and media outlets, to help the country rebuild after President Bashar Assad was toppled from power in a lightning rebel offensive in December.

The U.K. had put the sanctions in place against those who supported Assad’s repressive rule, helped violently suppress civilians and spread misinformation.

“The Syrian people deserve the opportunity to rebuild their country and economy, and a stable Syria is in the U.K.’s national interest,” Hamish Falconer, minister for the Middle East, said in a statement explaining the purpose of lifting the sanctions.

Syria’s new leaders have struggled to begin rebuilding the country’s decimated economy and infrastructure after nearly 14 years of civil war. The new authorities in Damascus have made a push for harsh sanctions imposed by western countries on Assad’s government to be lifted, with limited success.

Financial sanctions and asset freezes were lifted on several government agencies, including the ministries of interior and defense, the Foreign Office said.

Sanctions were also dropped against the General Organization of Radio and TV, a state-run agency that allegedly spread propaganda for Assad and incited violence against civilians. The Foreign Office said it also lifted sanctions against Al Watan, a newspaper, Cham Press TV, and Sama TV, for spreading misinformation.

Sanctions imposed against Assad and associates remain in place and legislation was amended to allow the former leader and others to be held accountable for atrocities committed against Syrians.

In March, the U.K. dropped sanctions against two dozen Syrian businesses, mostly banks and oil companies.

The Trump administration in the U.S. has yet to formally recognize the new Syrian government led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa, an Islamist former insurgent who led the offensive that ousted Assad. The militant group al-Sharaa led, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, remains a U.S.-designated terrorist organization, and the sanctions imposed on Damascus under Assad remain in place.

However, Washington has eased some restrictions. The U.S. Treasury in January issued a general license, lasting six months, that authorizes certain transactions with the Syrian government, including some energy sales and incidental transactions.

The European Union, meanwhile, has begun to ease some energy and transport sanctions and banking restrictions against Syria, suspending measures targeting oil, gas and electricity as well as transport, including the aviation sector.



Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

US asks for home addresses, biometrics of H-1B applicants first time ever: ‘Highly unusual’ – The Times of India

Published

on


USCIS is seeking home address and biometrics as additional data from H-1B applicants, if there is any ‘adverse information’ about the applicant.

In a fresh trouble for H-1B applicants, federal immigrant authorities are asking for home addresses and biometrics for H-1B and employment-based immigrant petitions, which immigrant lawyers think is highly unusual, as biometrics are not generally required. Immigrant authorities are issuing Requests for Evidence (RFE) for this data.
A Request for Evidence is a formal notice issued by the USCIS when additional documents are required for evaluating a petition. It can not be seen as a denial but a standard part of the process if there is any gap in the applications. According to USCIS guidelines, an RFE should clearly outline which eligibility criteria have not been met, explain why existing materials are insufficient, and suggest what additional evidence could help meet the requirements.
These requests are quite common if there is a missing documentation, inconsistencies in project details or a lack of supporting evidence.

Is it targeting H-1Bs amid crackdown on immigrants?

Immigration law firm Goel & Anderson’s Vic Goel told Forbes this is highly unusual because biometrics are not typically required for these case types.”The RFEs also fail to explain the nature of the adverse information, leaving employers and attorneys in the dark. It appears that DHS [Department of Homeland Security] may be using AI tools to flag individuals based on undisclosed data, possibly from social media or other government databases.”
“We have encountered potentially adverse information related to the beneficiary. To continue processing your application or petition, we required an updated address for the beneficiary so that we may collect biometric data,” a USCIS adjudicator wrote in a Request for Evidence, according to Forbes.
The “adverse information” part goes along with the crackdown on immigrants by the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently said making America safe means revoking visas when threats arise. “US visa holders should know in no uncertain terms that the US government’s rigorous security vetting does not end once a visa is granted,” Rubio said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version