JOBS AND EDUCATION
Private vs public schools: Is Trump’s budget gamble tilting the balance? – The Times of India

The tug-of-war between private and public schooling has long been cemented as a contentious battle, embedded with varying ideologies on access, quality, and equity in education. Trump signed a law that has further fanned the flames of discourse, raising pressing questions about the balance of power and the allocation of federal resources in education.
The federal budget resolution approved by Congress narrowly averted a government shutdown and ostensibly aims to maintain funding stability while negotiations for a comprehensive fiscal year 2026 budget continue. Yet, the discretionary power granted to the executive branch under this continuing resolution has left education advocates grappling with anxiety. Without explicit, clear allocations for numerous significant educational grants—such as Title II for instructional improvement and professional development and the McKinney-Vento Homeless Act for vulnerable students—the fear of unpredictable funding cuts looms large.
The Trump administration has demonstrated a readiness to exercise this discretion. By freezing funds or reallocating resources, it has challenged the conventions of legislative intent. The ambiguity entrenched in the resolution’s language—where substantial grants are masked under generalized terms like “innovation and improvement” or “special education”—creates a gateway for selective funding practices. Critics argue that this leeway could be wielded to prioritize private and charter schools over traditional public institutions, shifting the paradigm of federal support.
Private vs. public: A battle of ideologies
Proponents of private school choice perceive this shift as a necessary correction—a means to nurture competition and improve educational standards. They believe that private schools, unshackled by bureaucratic red tape, can offer customized curricula and innovative teaching methodologies. For them, private institutions symbolize a beacon of opportunity.
Conversely, public school supporters caution against this approach, asserting that increased funding for private entities undermines the very structure of equitable education. Public schools serve a large cohort of students from low-income, marginalized communities, including those with special needs. Reducing their funding risks exacerbating educational disparities. Additionally, the potential for private and charter schools to siphon funds without strict accountability mechanisms remains a significant concern.
The federal influence: More than just dollars
Federal funding, though accounting for only about 10% of the overall K-12 budget, plays a crucial role in addressing inequities. Programs like the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) ensure that students with special needs receive appropriate resources. However, the absence of clear budget allocations jeopardizes these protections. If the administration continues to withhold funds or prioritize private and charter initiatives, the repercussions could be profound—leaving schools unable to support their most vulnerable populations adequately.
Implications for the future
With the fiscal year 2025 already underway and no finalized federal budget in sight, the stage is set for further turbulence. The forthcoming fiscal year 2026 budget negotiations are expected to reignite debates on consolidating grants into lump-sum payments to states—an approach many fear could dilute the targeted impact of federal aid.
Furthermore, the precarious nature of federal funding has left lawmakers hesitant to integrate expected allocations into their budgets. The possibility of sudden federal cuts threatens their ability to sustain teacher salaries, infrastructure improvements, and essential educational services.
A crossroads for American education
The Trump administration’s approach has spotlighted a critical question: Should the federal government steer resources toward fostering private choice, or should it remain a bastion of support for public schools, especially those in high-need areas? As the political battle prevails, the outcome will not only shape the future of American education but also reflect broader societal values about access, equity, and the role of government in safeguarding public welfare.
Ultimately, this unfolding scenario compels stakeholders to reconsider the importance of equitable education in America. Will the pursuit of private choice serve as a catalyst for innovation or deepen existing disparities? The stakes have never been higher.
JOBS AND EDUCATION
Tennessee legislature adjourns after passing DEI restrictions – The Times of India

Tennessee’s Republican-controlled legislature closed its session Tuesday by pushing through a decisive set of bills targeting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives. In a crescendo of conservative policymaking, lawmakers dismantled long-standing frameworks meant to bolster representation in government and higher education, replacing them with a strict meritocratic model. Central to the legislative finale was a bill that directly targets the infrastructure of DEI. The measure orders the dissolution of state and local offices tasked with promoting diversity, mandates the elimination of identity-based criteria for board appointments, and instructs the removal of demographic benchmarks in employment policies across public institutions.
From representation to “qualification”
Lawmakers also gave final approval to a companion bill barring public agencies, including higher education institutions, from making hiring decisions based on an individual’s race, ethnicity, sex, or age. Instead, agencies must rely solely on “merit,” “qualifications,” veteran status, or lawful eligibility. The law repositions Tennessee firmly within a growing conservative ideology that views demographic consideration as antithetical to fairness.
A policy echo of Trump-era ideology
The Tennessee legislation is not occurring in a vacuum. It mirrors initiatives launched under President Donald Trump, whose administration sought to link the distribution of federal funds to the exclusion of DEI policies. That precedent laid the groundwork for state-level action—Tennessee now becomes a key player in actualizing that agenda.
Boards to lose identity-based representation
Beyond hiring practices, the new laws strike directly at identity-based governance structures. Requirements that certain public boards maintain racial, gender, or age representation have been deleted. Critics argue this strips underrepresented communities of vital political visibility; proponents counter that appointments should be blind to personal characteristics and based on perceived competence alone.
Opposition raises alarm bells
Civil rights advocates and education leaders have condemned the bills, warning they will reverse decades of effort to correct systemic inequalities. Others fear the chilling effect these moves could have on recruitment, retention, and morale within public service sectors.
Higher education in the crosshairs
Public universities—long champions of diversity offices and equity initiatives—are now under pressure to restructure or eliminate these arms. The University of Tennessee system and others will be forced to reexamine staff positions, student programs, and scholarship criteria that once relied on DEI frameworks.
A new conservative doctrine emerges
Tennessee’s Republican-controlled legislature closed its session Tuesday by pushing through a decisive set of bills targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. In a crescendo of conservative policymaking, lawmakers dismantled long-standing frameworks meant to bolster representation in government and higher education, replacing them with a strict meritocratic model.
DEI programs dismantled statewide
Central to the legislative finale was a bill that directly targets the infrastructure of DEI. The measure orders the dissolution of state and local offices tasked with promoting diversity, mandates the elimination of identity-based criteria for board appointments, and instructs the removal of demographic benchmarks in employment policies across public institutions.
JOBS AND EDUCATION
AIIMS INI SS July 2025 registration underway, window closes on May 6: Check direct link to apply and important details here – The Times of India

The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi has opened the online application window for the Institute of National Importance Super-Speciality Test (INI SS) July 2025 session. Interested and eligible candidates can submit their applications through the official website, iniss.aiimsexams.ac.in, on or before May 6, 2025.
The entrance examination will be conducted on May 24 for admission into Doctorate of Medicine (DM)/Master of Chirurgiae (M.Ch.) courses at leading medical institutions including All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), and Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (SCTIMST).
AIIMS INI SS 2025: Eligibility criteria and age limits
To apply for the AIIMS INI SS July 2025, candidates must fulfill the following eligibility conditions:
- Must possess MD/MS or DNB in a relevant specialty.
- Must complete the qualifying degree by July 31, 2025.
Upper age limit as on July 1, 2025:
Age relaxations:
- OBC: 3 years
- SC/ST: 5 years
- Ex-Servicemen/ECOs: 5 years
AIIMS INI SS 2025: How to apply
Candidates can follow the steps given here to complete the application process:
Step 1. Visit the official portal, iniss.aiimsexams.ac.in
Step 2. Click on ‘New Registration’ for fresh applicants.
Step 3. Fill in the registration form and personal details carefully as guided by the portal.
Step 4. Submit the form and download the confirmation page for future reference.
Alternatively, candidates can click here to submit their applications for AIIMS INI SS 2025.
AIIMS INI SS 2025: Important dates
Candidates must adhere to the official schedule to avoid missing any deadlines. Key dates for the AIIMS INI SS July 2025 session are:
JOBS AND EDUCATION
OSSC releases Excise SI admit card 2025 for written exam on April 27: Check direct link to download hall tickets and key details here – The Times of India

The Odisha Staff Selection Commission (OSSC) has released the admit card for the Excise Sub Inspector (SI) written exam 2025. Candidates who have applied for the OSSC Combined Recruitment Examination (CRE) for Excise SI posts can now download their admit card from the official website, ossc.gov.in.
The admit card includes key details such as exam venue, reporting time, gate closing time, and important exam instructions.
The OSSC had earlier scheduled the admit card release for April 21, 2025, but it was postponed. However, there is no change in the written exam date, which remains scheduled for April 27, 2025.
OSSC Excise SI admit card 2025: How to download
Candidates can follow the steps given here to access their OSSC CRE 2025 admit card:
Step 1. Visit the official website, ossc.gov.in.
Step 2. Go to the “What’s New” section and click on the link to download the Excise SI written exam admit card.
Step 3. Enter your login credentials.
Step 4. View and download your admit card.
Step 5. Take a printout to keep safe for exam day.
Alternatively, candidates can click here to download their hall tickets for OSSC Excise SI 2025.
OSSC Excise SI 2025: Details mentioned on the admit card
Candidates are advised to verify the following information printed on the admit card:
- Candidate’s Name and Father’s Name
- Date of Birth and Category
- Photograph and Signature
- Reporting Time and Gate Closing Time
- Exam Time and Venue
- Exam Instructions
If any errors are found, candidates must immediately contact OSSC for correction.
OSSC Excise SI 2025: Exam pattern
The written examination will consist of three subjects with a total of 150 questions. The duration is 3 hours, and there is a negative marking of 0.25 marks for every incorrect answer.
-
Entertainment2 months ago
J-Hope Gears Up to Release New Single ‘Sweet Dreams’ With Miguel
-
Lifestyle1 month ago
Kim Soo Hyun’s agency CONFIRMS past relationship with Kim Sae Ron in official statement; rubbish claims of involvement in actress’ death by suicide | – The Times of India
-
Entertainment2 months ago
Purav Jha creates a parody of Samay Raina’s India’s Got Latent, internet reacts: ‘Pakka FIR hoga’ | – The Times of India
-
Lifestyle2 months ago
Aamir Khan reveals Javed Akhtar and Amitabh Bachchan told him, ‘Lagaan would definitely be a flop’ | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India
-
CITIES2 months ago
Hampi rape case: 3rd suspect arrested from TN | Bengaluru News – The Times of India
-
Technology2 months ago
Sunita Williams is returning to Earth on… : Know how and when NASA astronaut will return from space | – The Times of India
-
Lifestyle1 month ago
Anupam Kher shares a fun video with Satish Kaushik’s daughter Vanshika on Holi: ‘They are back’ | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India
-
Entertainment2 months ago
Pritam breaks silence on claims of BLACKPINK’s Jennie copying Alia Bhatt’s Rani intro song from RARKPK: ‘Rather than tearing…’