Connect with us

Entertainment

‘Good Bad Ugly’ movie review: Ajith Kumar and Adhik’s pop-culture goldmine delivers despite hollowness

Published

on

‘Good Bad Ugly’ movie review: Ajith Kumar and Adhik’s pop-culture goldmine delivers despite hollowness


Who knew that a character sending a specific someone’s photo on a WhatsApp group would make for one of the ‘massiest’ sequences we have seen in recent times? Director Adhik Ravichandran, who, over the last ten years, has gotten us used to his use of bright colours, dutch-angle shots and quirky humour, takes it up a notch with his fifth film Good Bad Ugly (GBU), and with his idol Ajith Kumar headlining it, the young filmmaker pulls off what netizens would term as a “fanboy sambavam.”

In GBU, AK (Ajith Kumar) is a retired gangster who has spent his due share of time behind bars and wants to lead a happy life with his wife, Ramya (Trisha), and son, Vihaan (Karthikeya Dev). But trouble comes knocking his way when his son is wrongly arrested and put behind bars. For the sake of the very son for whom he put down arms, AK now has to enter a world he vowed never to return to.

Mark Antony will remain unchallenged as Adhik’s most complex film yet as he goes back to his roots to conjure a wafer-thin plot for GBU. So what does he fill up the film with? There’s Ajith to save the day, and when he isn’t walking or talking, we have a slew of characters that mouth references to the actor’s yesteryear films. These references are stuffed to the brim in Good Bad Ugly. If nothing else, it makes for a great drinking game: if you took a shot each time an Ajith film reference is made, you would be out cold before it’s intermission.

To run with the Gen-Zoomers, I would call GBU a ‘vibe.’ You would either find it to be your cup of soothing tea or an ostentatiously made smoothie of mindless reel-worthy sequences stitched together. The film certainly takes time to get going, and if you are like me, it does grow on you and might even leave you wondering if it actually gets better when it picks pace or whether you have gotten used to this world that Adhik has elaborately crafted. No wonder he starts the film with a card that goes ‘Welcome to the world of GBU’ and he is not kidding with it. In this world, logic does not take the back seat; it’s tied to the back of the car and dragged for miles only to realise that the rope snapped a long time ago. If you are familiar with Adhik’s work, logic and emotionality would be the last things you would expect to find here.

Good Bad Ugly (Tamil)

Director: Adhik Ravichandran

Cast: Ajith Kumar, Trisha Krishnan, Arjun Das, Prasanna, Karthikeya Dev, Priya Prakash Varrier

Runtime: 140 minutes

Storyline: A retired gangster is forced to take up arms one last time to save his son

And if you are not familiar with Ajith’s body of work, GBU isn’t for you. The references to his previous films start right from the very first scene, which includes a voiceover by Mahanadhi Shankar, the man whose dialogue in Dheena gave Ajith the nickname ‘Thala.’ Of course, as expected, there are references to other hits such as Billa, Varalaru, Mankatha, Villain, Amarkalam and Vaalee. What comes as a pleasant surprise are the references to relatively lesser-known titles like Red and Kireedam. In fact, it’s not just Ajith who gets this treatment. Simran, who appears in a cameo as Priya from Vaalee, talks to AK about his ‘Sona’ (IFKYK). Trisha supples a Lesa Lesa callback, Prabhu repeats a line he once mouthed in Billa, Prasanna gets a Sneha reference… the list keeps going. There’s even a Vijay reference!

Just as you wonder if Adhik is relying solely on these callbacks, he brings the best of Tamil pop culture to the screen — right from the trending meme jokes such as the ‘Irunga bhai’ line and the ‘card mela irrukura 16 number’ joke to remixing the iconic ‘Puli Puli’ song by Darkkey Nagaraja (apart from crooning the song, the Samba Rock icon makes a cameo too). Speaking of yesteryear songs, if Adhik hadn’t warned you with the ‘Panju Mittai’ remix in Mark Antony, we get everything from a remix of ‘Oththa Roova’ from Nattupura Pattu, a sampling of ‘En Jodi’ from Vikram and usage of ‘Sakalakala Vallavan’ and ‘Thottu Thottu Pesum’ tracks.

Arguably, the biggest trick Adhik pulls off is how he stacks easter eggs and references to hide the utter lack of an intriguing plot. Nevertheless, cracks appear multiple times in the facade that he has carefully sculpted. The secondary characters rarely have anything to do besides praising AK, and with even Arjun Das’s The Prestige-inspired villain failing to intimidate, GBU suffers without a fascinating conflict. At its core, GBU is the story of a gangster husband and a government official wife who use their brawn and brain to save their son from being wrongfully punished by the law. However, the film never builds on this. Instead, it becomes a showreel by a fanboy who has gotten to work with his favourite star — which, surprisingly, works in places. What comes as a pleasant shocker are the references to international titles, which, we hope, do not land the team in troubled waters over IP issues.

Ajith Kumar and Trisha in a still from ‘Good Bad Ugly’

Ajith Kumar and Trisha in a still from ‘Good Bad Ugly’
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

With an awfully predictable story that leaves very little room for plot twists or surprises, GBU banks on its star and his unabashed, unhinged persona that fans have missed for years, making it an entertaining watch. From ‘Thala’ references to letting the supporting cast sing praise of how he’s the Red Dragon, Ajith lets his hair down. To see him shake a leg or pull off quirky lines like ‘bank ah, mottai ah’, is unarguably a treat, especially for his fans who had very little to enjoy in his other recent films. Even if we discount the annoying one-liners (one goes, “I am not Frank, it’s just a prank”), it’s ultimately his dialogues with which Adhik blurs the line between reality and fiction, a personal favourite being one on how AK disbanded the clubs while he was an active gangster.

In his most technically strong film to date, Adhik’s team behind the camera have done a brilliant job. While Abinandhan Ramanujam’s camera work wonderfully captures the gigantic yet intricate sets and vast outdoors of Spain and Mumbai, editor Vijay Velukutty does the hard job of putting together a series of sequences with jarring tonal jumps. Anu Vardhan’s costumes deserve special praise for making AK look dapper, irrespective of whether he’s dressed in an uber-cool Versace silk shirt or a sleek three-piece suit. GV Prakash’s songs might not have hit the bullseye, but his background score amps up the star vehicle.

Considering how there’s a scene where AK breaks the fourth wall and has a conversation with the director, we will probably never get used to the rules of this ‘world.’ Even when his films like AAA and Bagheera missed the mark by miles, Adhik’s strong suit has always been his cinematic language and use of nostalgia, which he majorly banks on for GBU. The minor examples of a car number plate being his jumbled name or going with a crazy casting choice — such as roping in Usha Uthup for the role of a judge — stand testimony to his wacky ideas, which do wonders when they work, making you wish there were more laced between the umpteen references.

That the film’s title is a hat-tip to the legendary The Good, the Bad and the Ugly reminds one of the famous line from the Sergio Leone directorial, “When You Have To Shoot, Shoot. Don’t Talk”. Adhik has taken his biggest shot, and it could possibly be the best fan service Tamil cinema has ever seen. Even when it’s far from perfect and feels like a brass-knuckle punch to our senses, Good Bad Ugly is loving work of nostalgia.

Good Bad Ugly is currently running in theatres



Source link

Entertainment

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar on his first independent work Deal at the Border

Published

on

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar on his first independent work Deal at the Border


Shankar M K

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar’s work is a profound meditation on his society’s shifting relationship with the past and the evolving landscape of Kyrgyzstan’s traditions. At the heart of his cinematic exploration is death, through which he examines societal ruptures and continuities, and reimagines a future.

Kyrgyz society, like other societies previously part of the Soviet Union, has had to deal with three traditions — pre-Soviet, Soviet socialist, and contemporary.

Dastan made A Father’s Will in 2016 and Road to Eden in 2020, both in collaboration with fellow filmmaker Bakyt Mukul. A Father’s Will won the Golden Zenith at the 40th Montreal World Film Festival. Deal at the Border, screened at the recent Bangalore International Film Festival, is Zhapar’s first independent work.

While A Father’s Will was about how reviving an old death ritual helped pacify people defrauded by a man now deceased, Road to Eden reflected on the loss of meaning caused by material compulsions of modern life. With Deal at the Border, Dastan turns to even darker realities — modern slavery and human rights issues. Death here becomes a moment of moral reckoning.

As an amorphous repository of attitudes, practices, and relational hierarchies, a tradition never truly dies. In Dastan’s films, two traditions reside within the present — struggling for attention and validation. The resonances of this exploration are impossible to miss in India, bogged down by a similar contest between putative traditions.

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

In an exclusive, Dastan shares his thoughts on the many issues of idea, ideology and creative expression. Excerpts:


Why is it that you question some traditions and try to restore respect for others?

It is true that I am questioning some traditions, but I am not seeking to restore respect for others. Things emerge in the process of scripting and filming. They beg to be projected on the screen and I am persuaded by this kind of insight.


Death and how people respond to it seems to be a common theme in all your films.

That is right. However, it was not by conscious design — it turned out that way. Death occupied centrestage and spliced three of my films into an unintended trilogy. However, the ideas I am now working on are about survival and the desire for freedom.

A Father’s Will plays out an aspect of the Kyrgyz attitude to death. People at a burial desire closure. They want to accept and forgive. Also, they like to ask what kind of a person the deceased was as a prelude to restoring dignity to the dead. These rituals serve to unite people, especially family, in times of sorrow.

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar during a shoot

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar during a shoot
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement


Why is the yurt (a portable, circular dwelling, traditionally used by nomadic people in Central Asia) so important?

The Kyrgyz had a nomadic, mobile way of life. The yurt naturally became home and a symbol of family stability. It also represents the strength of the national collective, serving a material function and as a spiritual metaphor.

A Father’s Will turns out to be based on a book written by a character in The Road to Eden

When Bakyt Mukul and I wrote the script for A Father’s Will, we thought it would be nice to have a literary work associated with the film’s story. When we were scripting for The Road to Eden, and came up with the image of the sick writer Sapar, we thought he could write, for example, a book titled The Father’s Testament referring to our previous film. In this way, we would have an imaginary author for an imaginary book on which our first film had been based. In this fashion, we were able to thematically unite the two films. The stories take place in the same universe, same ethical ecosystem.

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement


What is your next film about?

I am actively working on three ideas. One is the story of guards at the border of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Another is about modern slavery.


Why is slavery a subtext of Deal at the Border?

Slavery has been on my mind for a long time as I have been personally affected by it. My brother Aktan was enslaved in a neighbouring country with our uncle. Luckily, they managed to escape. The script was written by Aktan and I.

While writing the script, I studied modern slavery. I learnt that Kyrgyzstan ranks first among Central Asian countries whose citizens are enslaved abroad, mostly in Kazakhstan, Russia, Turkey and the UAE. According to the International Labour Organisation, more than 50 million people are currently enslaved worldwide and 70% of them are women. These statistics are horrifying. We must bring this to the notice of viewers everywhere.

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar during a shoot

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar during a shoot
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement


From what sources do you draw inspiration from?

Definitely from the Kyrgyz epic of Manas. It is a poem with more than 1,50,000 verses. It is about the legendary past of many nations of Central Asia, including the Mongol, Kitai, and Altai.

Newspaper reports often provide a starting point for an episode. I am also inspired by themes other directors explore. The most important thing is to select the right theme or story. The story must resonate in you. It must refer to some piece of today’s reality or to a possible state of affairs in the future.

I prefer to make films about the rural and remote regions, though cities have their stories too. I ride the bus and observe people as they travel and converse. I can learn much about their troubles and what makes them happy. I dig into real life material so I can use them in my films.


What are your thoughts on Indian cinema?

I am in awe of Indian films screened at international film festivals — they deal with serious issues in interesting ways. I would like to be involved in a joint venture with India sometime in the future. The first Kyrgyz feature film was made in 1958, by which time Indian cinema was already in bloom.

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar during a shoot

Kyrgyz filmmaker Dastan Zhapar during a shoot
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement


Are you responding to any particular filmmaking tradition?

I like the image of Duishen, the teacher created by Kyrgyz author Chingiz Aitmatov in his novel First Teacher that was later made into a film. Duishen brings knowledge and knowledge is light, pulling millions of people out of the darkness of ignorance. Duishen had a fanatic faith in a bright future ushered in by literacy and education. Eventually that is what led mankind to seemingly impossible things such as space exploration. I believe such people are in short supply in our crazy world today.



Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

The Cecilian Choir, from Bengaluru, raises its voice for a cause

Published

on

The Cecilian Choir, from Bengaluru, raises its voice for a cause


One of Bengaluru’s oldest choirs, The Cecilian Choir, will perform for a fundraiser in Bengaluru. Titled Memories Are Made of This, it is a fundraiser for St. Joseph’s University Scholarship Programs. The Cecilian Choir was started in 1982 by a group of musicians under the leadership of Reverend Dr Theodore Pereira.  

This year, the concert will be held at St. Joseph’s Auditorium, and offers financial assistance to students who come from economically weaker sections of society, says Arthur B Pais, President, Cecilian Choir.

The choir, he says, has been around for 42 years. “We are probably the longest serving choir in Bengaluru and intend to keep this legacy going. All our stage performances are fundraisers.”

Arthur describes each of the choir’s fundraisers as a worthy cause and over the years Cecilian Choir has helped raised funds for Multiple Sclerosis Society, Maria Seva Sangha, Abala Ashraya Sangha, Atma Shakti Vidayala Society, The Karunashraya Hospice, St Mary’s Orphanage, Sumanahalli Leprosy Rehabilitation Centre, The Association of People with Disability and Jeevarathani Foundation.

“In fact, when Karunahsraya started, we helped raise funds for their infrastructure. The concert was held at Guru Nanak Bhavan,” recalls Arthur.

Besides these, Arthur says some of their memorable performances include the 1999 concert at the invitation of Ministry of Tourism, Israel to perform at the Sherovah Theatre in Jerusalem and at a monastery in Nazareth for the millennium celebrations; and the 2011 concert presented by Indian Council of Cultural Relations (ICCR) and the Bangalore School of Music (BSM); in the presence of the ex-President of India, Pratibha Patil.

“We were the only Choir to have ever sung a song in Kannada at the Rashtrapati Bhavan,” shares the chorister.

Arthur B Pais, President, Cecilian Choir
| Photo Credit:
Special Arrangement

St Joseph’s University, Arthur says, help students with excellent academic records, high achievers, and differently-abled students. “The university also has study and residential scholarships, besides giving them midday meals, which most of the time, is the only meal some students get due to their financial situation. That’s who we are singing for.”

The first half of the concert, Arthur says, will feature music across eight decades. “There will be a Broadway musical medley, jazz, ballads and masterpieces, some of which, will be a cappella. The second half includes ‘Remember the Cross’ an Easter Cantata that intertwines songs from Palm Sunday to Easter Sunday in a blended and contemporary setting”.

The choir will be conducted by Deirdre Fernandes-Dominic and will have Rebecca Thomas-Colaco (piano), Justin A Santosh (drums), Eric Samuel (guitar), Pearl Mukadam (bass), Darren Sherwin and Sabarish R (keyboards) and 25 choristers.

Sing in harmony, Arthur said the choir is nothing like a band performance. “We are a choir and sing in multi-part harmony, which could be either a three, four, six or eight-part. When we say ‘harmony’, I strongly believe one has to experience it to know how a voice can modulate itself and give you different tones, which leads to a fantastic experience.”

Arthur is a first tenor, and has been singing with the since 2000. “Becky, (Rebecca) has been with us since 2005. She is a reputed pianist, known world-wide and now is the director of faculty too with BSM (Bangalore School of Music).”

A self taught singer, Arthur took to music as a young boy and started singing in his church choir. “That is where you get noticed by conductors and are picked up for choral singing. For me, choral singing came naturally and I found it easy to pick it up.”

The concert is on April 26 and 27, at 3.30pm and 6.30pm at St Joseph’s University Auditorium, 36 Lalbagh Road. Donor passes/tickets on BookMyShow.



Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

This superstar’s sister, Priyanka Chopra, Sridevi’s costume designer, was ‘uncomfortable’ working with Rajesh Khanna, quit acting in 10 years, died at 51 due to..

Published

on

This superstar’s sister, Priyanka Chopra, Sridevi’s costume designer, was ‘uncomfortable’ working with Rajesh Khanna, quit acting in 10 years, died at 51 due to..



Simple Kapadia was a part of the film world for 10 years, during which she worked with Jeetendra in Shakka and Chakravyuha and played supporting roles in Lootmaar, Zamaane Ko Dikhana Hai, Jeevan Dhaara and Dulha Bikta Hai. Her last acting gig was an item song for Parakh in 1987.

Dimple Kapadia became an overnight sensation after she debuted with Bobby (1973), opposite Rishi Kapoor. The film became a super hit and established Dimple Kapadia as a leading star. While the actress went on to have a successful career in Bollywood, many remained unaware of Dimple Kapadia’s sister Simple Kapadia’s journey in the film industry. Simple Kapadia pursued acting, following in her sister’s footsteps, and made her Bollywood debut opposite none other than Rajesh Khanna, her brother-in-law, in the 1977 film Anurodh. 

Unlike Bobby, Anurodh proved to be a flop at the box office, one of the possible reasons being the lack of chemistry between Simple Kapadia and Rajesh Khanna’s chemistry. Simple Kapadia had also once revealed how she was uncomfortable working with her ‘jiju’ Rajesh Khanna. “It is definitely not a ‘Bobby’ and can never even be compared to it. Just like I guess I can never be another Dimple. Actually, I’m quite uncomfortable working with him because when you know a person inside out it seems funny seeing him so different in front of a camera,” she told India Today in an interview. 

In the same interview, Simple Kapadia also expressed how she was nervous to be working with Rajesh Khanna because of his star status. “Before I started actual shooting with him, I had thought it would be a great moral support to have somebody known to you. But then I found I was quite nervous, probably with the thought that I was acting opposite a far more experienced actor. Kaka was very helpful, but then I sensed he too wasn’t feeling comfortable coming and telling me how to do the scene if I made a mistake,” she said.

Simple Kapadia was a part of the film world for 10 years, during which she worked with Jeetendra in Shakka and Chakravyuha and played supporting roles in Lootmaar, Zamaane Ko Dikhana Hai, Jeevan Dhaara and Dulha Bikta Hai. Her last acting gig was an item song for Parakh in 1987.

After stepping away from acting, Simple Kapadia tried her hands at costume design and worked for many actors including Sunny Deol, Tabu, Amrita Singh, Sridevi, and Priyanka Chopra. She also won a National Film Award in 1994 for Best Costume Design for Rudaali.

Simple Kapadia was diagnosed with cancer in 2006 and tragically died in November 2009, aged 51.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.