Connect with us

WORLD

Canadian airlines cut down seats to US amid intense trade war, revised travel rules – The Times of India

Published

on

Canadian airlines cut down seats to US amid intense trade war, revised travel rules – The Times of India


Canadian airlines are reducing the number of seats for US.

Canadian airlines have started eliminating seats for the United States even in April, the peak tourism time between the two countries, the New York Times reported, stating that the aviation industry is telling under the heat between the US-Canada trade war. The United States also has a set of new rules for Canadians travelling to the country, plus Canada is boycotting US things as President Donald Trump wants Canada to become its 51st state. There is no official call to boycott US destinations this season but there is less demand.
The reductions range from 7 percent by Air Canada to 25 percent by Flair Airlines, a discount airline, according to Visual Approach Analytics, an aviation research company, NYT reported.
A Canadian travel agency told the outlet that they are now changing their flight packages. They have entirely stopped promoting US destinations as they are receiving severe backlash for that. The focus is now more on destinations in Europe.
Air Canada told NYT that it would be reducing some U.S. flights to warmer destinations “to reflect commercial demand. OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited, an analytics company based in the United Kingdom, said advance bookings for routes between Canada and the United States from April through October are down by roughly 70 per cent, compared with the same time period last year, the report said.
Canadian residents took about 586,000 trips to the United States in February, a 13 percent drop from the same month last year, according to Canada’s national census agency. In a recent report, it also found that the number of car trips across the border in February fell to 1.2 million from about 1.5 million in February 2024, the report added.
US airlines are also reducing the frequency of routes to Canada because of the big drop in Canadian traffic into the US. United Airlines canceled a new daily route between Toronto and Los Angeles that it had planned to begin in May and said it would also reduce the frequency of other existing routes to Canada.
New US travel rules for Canada
Starting from April 11, Canadians who will be in the US for more than 30 days will have to register with the authorities. If they don’t, it could result in “penalties, fines and misdemeanors”





Source link

WORLD

US consular officers to crack down on birth tourism – The Times of India

Published

on


AI-generated image (Credit: Bing image creator)

The US department of state, consular affairs, is cracking down on ‘birth tourism’. According to an update on social media, US consular officers are stopping foreign visitors from abusing the US immigration system through ‘birth tourism’. “If a visa applicant is trying to use a tourist visa for the primary purpose of giving birth in the US to get the child citizenship, the visa will be denied,” the social media post on Thursday said.
“It is unacceptable for foreign parents to use a US tourist visa for the primary purpose of giving birth in the United States to obtain citizenship for the child, which also could result in American taxpayers paying the medical care costs,” the post by the US department of state, said.
“This is known as birth tourism and US consular officers deny all such visa applications under US immigration law. Those who abuse our immigration system through birth tourism may be ineligible for future visas or travel to the United States. This is one more way the US department of state is serving and protecting American taxpayers and communities.”





Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

Donald Trump pardons GOP politician who spent memorial funds on plastic surgery and daughter’s wedding – The Times of India

Published

on


US president Donald Trump has granted a full pardon to Michele Fiore, a prominent Nevada Republican convicted of federal wire fraud. Fiore was awaiting sentencing after being found guilty in October 2024 of misusing funds meant to honour a fallen police officer. Prosecutors said she diverted more than $70,000 raised for a statue to cover personal expenses, including plastic surgery, rent, and her daughter’s wedding.
Fiore, a former Las Vegas city councilwoman and state legislator, has long been a public supporter of Trump. She ran unsuccessfully for state treasurer in 2022 and was later appointed as a judge in Nye County, Nevada. Despite her conviction, she was elected last year to complete the term of a judge who had passed away, but was later suspended without pay due to her legal troubles.

Trump pardons ex-Las Vegas councilwoman Michele Fiore after fraud conviction

In a Facebook post on Thursday, Fiore thanked Trump for the pardon and claimed that she had been the target of a decade-long campaign by the US government and select media outlets. The White House confirmed the pardon but gave no explanation for the decision, reported news agency Associated Press.
The move has drawn criticism from Democrats in Nevada. Hilary Barrett, Executive Director of the state’s Democratic Party, called it a “slap in the face” to law enforcement, accusing Trump of disregarding the seriousness of the crime.
Fiore plans to return to the bench next week, though the Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline has not yet issued a formal update on her suspension status.
Fiore’s legal troubles began in 2021 when FBI agents searched her Las Vegas home. Her conviction included six counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. She faced the possibility of decades in prison before Trump’s pardon overturned the verdict.





Source link

Continue Reading

WORLD

Sri Lanka: Opposition, media demand details of defence MoU with India 

Published

on


COLOMBO

Amid persisting questions from the political Opposition and media about Sri Lanka’s recent defence sector Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with India, the government has asked those seeking more information to use the country’s Right To Information (RTI) Act.

Addressing a media briefing earlier this week, Cabinet spokesperson Nalinda Jayatissa said some of the contents of the MoU cannot be released without India’s consent. The political Opposition, including the main Opposition bloc Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB or United People’s Power), has accused the Anura Kumara Dissanayake administration of “secrecy” and demanded that the MoUs signed with India be tabled in Parliament.

The MoU pertaining to the defence sector was one of seven signed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Sri Lanka from April 4 to 6. Others spanned areas such as energy co-operation, digital initiatives, and health. During the visit, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri told presspersons that the defence sector MoU is an “umbrella agreement” providing a framework to pursue ongoing defence sector cooperation in a more “structured” manner.

In his statement during the visit, PM Modi said he was “grateful to President Dissanayake for his sensitivity towards India’s interests.” “We believe that we have shared security interests. The security of both countries is interconnected and co-dependent,” he said.

Retired civil servant Austin Fernando, who has served as Secretary to the Ministry of Defence and as Sri Lanka’s High Commissioner to India, observed “Indian defence interests were exposed” in PM Modi’s remarks. “Do we share the much-critiqued Akhanda Bharat concept? Do we endorse Indian-Russian-American-Israeli security and defence interlinks as ours too? Do we connect with Sino-Indian clashes? We may have reservations,” he wrote in a recent newspaper column. Some other columnists argued that the MoU signalled a possible shift from the government’s “non-aligned” foreign policy.

The scrutiny of the MoU began in Sri Lanka even before Mr. Modi arrived in Colombo. Ahead of the state visit, Indian media reported that “a major defence pact” or “key defence deal” was to be signed with Sri Lanka, triggering scepticism among media commentators in Colombo.

The spotlight has only grown after the visit. Addressing a rally in the southern town of Galle days after Mr. Modi’s visit, President Dissanayake said the defence MoU signed with India “simply formalises ongoing joint operations and training sessions with India”. Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath clarified that it was a “non-binding MoU”, and not a “pact”.

An official source from Sri Lanka, familiar with the bilateral discussions on the MoU, told The Hindu: “Sri Lanka has nothing to worry about. As far as India is concerned, there has been a lot of baggage from its earlier interventions,” the source said, referring to the role of the Indian Peace Keeping Force and Operation Poomalai, carried out by the Indian Air Force to airdrop food in Jaffna, in the late 1980s. “Now it is time to move on, considering the strategic realities of today,” the source said, requesting anonymity citing the sensitivity of the issue.

In its editorial last weekend, the widely read Sunday Times noted that the MoUs pertaining to the ‘Energy Hub’ proposal in the strategically located eastern district of Trincomalee, and ‘defence cooperation’ “have raised uncomfortable questions” in Sri Lanka following Mr. Modi’s visit. “And what is most intriguing is why, when the Indian PM himself and commentators in Delhi are gaga over the MoUs, the Sri Lankan President and his government are maintaining a deafening silence — hiding them from the public?” the newspaper contended, urging the government to make the MoUs public.

Meanwhile, it is unclear if the MoU, pitched as a framework to formalise ongoing cooperation in personnel training and intelligence sharing, specifically addresses the area of permitting research vessels from China, an issue that has remained sensitive to Delhi.

Recently, some Indian media claimed that a proposed joint naval exercise of Pakistan and Sri Lanka was called off, after Colombo “refused” to entertain the request. The reports sought to link the “decision” to the recently signed MoU. However, the Sri Lankan side was quick to deny the reports.  Ministry of Defence spokesperson Colonel Nalin Herath told The Hindu: “There was no cancellation of such a joint exercise. We had a Pakistani Naval vessel call at a Colombo Port in March.” The official media release of the Sri Lankan Navy at the time said Pakistan Navy Ship (PNS) Aslat engaged in “a successful passage exercise” with its patrol vessel SLNS Samudura.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.

Exit mobile version