Connect with us

Lifestyle

Anurag Kashyap slams CBFC over cuts to Pratik Gandhi and Patralekhaa starrer Phule: ‘Ch*ya kaun hai koi to samjhave’ | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India

Published

on

Anurag Kashyap slams CBFC over cuts to Pratik Gandhi and Patralekhaa starrer Phule: ‘Ch*ya kaun hai koi to samjhave’ | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India


Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap has come out strongly against the censorship faced by Phule, the upcoming biographical drama directed by Ananth Mahadevan and starring Pratik Gandhi and Patralekhaa. The film, which revolves around social reformers Jyotiba and Savitribai Phule, is scheduled for release on April 25 but has been asked by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to undergo multiple edits before hitting theatres.
The CBFC has reportedly asked the makers to remove specific caste references, including words such as ‘Mahar’, ‘Mang’, ‘Peshvai’, and ‘Manu’s system of caste’, prompting criticism from filmmakers and social commentators.
Anurag Kashyap questions censorship process
Anurag Kashyap, who has never shied away from calling out censorship, shared his thoughts on Instagram Stories. Recalling his personal connection to the subject, he wrote, “Meri zindagi ka pehla natak Jyotiba aur Savitribai Phule pe tha. Bhai agar casteism nahin hota is desh mein toh unko kya zaroorat thi ladne ki. Ab ye Brahmin log ko sharam aa rahi hai ya wo sharam mein mare ja rahe hain ya phir ek alag Brahmin Bharat mein jee rahe hain jo hum dekh nahin paa rahe hain, ch*ya kaun hai koi to samjhave.” (The first play I ever did in my life was on Jyotiba and Savitribai Phule. If casteism didn’t exist in this country, why would they have needed to fight against it? Now these Brahmin groups either feel ashamed, are dying of shame, or perhaps they’re living in some alternate Brahmin-only India that we’re unable to see. Someone please explain—who’s the real fool here?)
In another post, he criticized the censorship process itself and questioned how certain groups were able to access unreleased films. “My question is, when the film goes for censoring, there are four members in the board. How the f* the groups and the wings get access to films until and unless they are given access to it? The whole f*ing system is rigged.”
Anurag Kashyap calls out government
Kashyap went further to highlight how Phule is just one of several films allegedly being suppressed due to their bold themes. He listed examples such as Punjab 95, Tees, Dhadak 2, and Phule, all of which, according to him, reflect uncomfortable truths. “I don’t know how many other films are blocked that exposes the agenda of this casteist, regionalist, racist government… so ashamed to see their own face in the mirror. So ashamed that they can’t even openly talk about what it is about the film that bothers them. F*in’ cowards.”

Anurag Kashyap feels filmmakers in India ‘can’t do anything that is remotely political or remotely religious’

Prior to this, filmmaker Anubhav Sinha also used social media to question the film censorship. The ‘Thappad’ director wrote on his IG, “Is there no caste system in society? Has it never existed? Why should we lie to ourselves? And then, why should only cinema be the one to lie? After all, the kind of content the Election Commission permits in speeches and what the CBFC allows in films—these cannot be two separate standards. Both are means of communicating with society.”





Source link

Lifestyle

‘Emergency’ lands in legal trouble: Makers of Kangana Ranaut starrer sued by author for ‘historical inaccuracies’ | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India

Published

on

‘Emergency’ lands in legal trouble: Makers of Kangana Ranaut starrer sued by author for ‘historical inaccuracies’ | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India


Kangana Ranaut’s much-talked-about film ‘Emergency’ has once again landed in legal trouble.The historical drama, which stars Ranaut as former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, is now caught in a legal mess after senior journalist and author Coomi Kapoor filed a lawsuit against the makers.
As reported by PTI, Kapoor has accused Kangana’s production house, Manikarnika Films Private Limited, and streaming platform Netflix of wrongly using her book and name, and of changing historical facts in the film.
‘They breached the contract’
Coomi Kapoor, who wrote ‘The Emergency: A Personal History’, claims that she had signed a contract with Manikarnika Films and Penguin Random House allowing the adaptation of her book into a feature film. However, she believes that the agreement has been “blatantly breached.” According to the agreement, the filmmakers had the right to creatively adapt the content. But there were two important conditions added by Kapoor herself, on her daughter’s legal advice.
“My daughter is a lawyer, so on her advice, I had included two clauses. While the producers had full artistic freedom to create the film, nothing should be altered that contradicts historical facts that are publicly available,” Kapoor told PTI.
She added, “The contract also stated that the author’s name and book could not be used for promoting or exploiting the film without prior written consent. I was in Goa and had not seen the film at the time, believing that they would honour the contract. But they are still claiming that the film is based on the book.”

Film accused of using her name without permission
The journalist says she was shocked to see that the title of the film – ‘Emergency’ – was too close to her book’s name. She believes this was done on purpose to gain attention. Kapoor said the original plan was for the film to use only one specific chapter from her book focusing on Indira Gandhi. Instead, the film went much further, she claims, and included “historical inaccuracies”.
“Factually, the Emergency was not removed till after Mrs Indira Gandhi lost the general election in March 1977,” her legal notice stated.
Kapoor also pointed out that the filmmakers did not respond to the legal notices she had sent on 3 April. With no reply from Kangana’s team or Netflix, she moved ahead with a formal lawsuit.

Seeking compensation for ‘damage’
Kapoor says the film has caused her serious reputational and professional harm. She’s now asking for compensation to cover what she calls emotional, financial and legal damage.
As mentioned by PTI, the legal notice read, “If you fail to comply, our client reserves the right to initiate legal proceedings to seek appropriate remedies for this egregious violation of her rights.”
What is the film ‘Emergency’ about?
Released in cinemas on 17 January 2025, ‘Emergency’ is a political drama set during one of the most controversial periods in Indian history, the 21-month Emergency declared by Indira Gandhi from 1975 to 1977. Kangana Ranaut not only stars in the lead role as Indira Gandhi but also directs and co-produces the film under her banner Manikarnika Films. The cast includes some well-known names like Anupam Kher Shreyas Talpade, Milind Soman, Mahima Chaudhry, and others.

Kangana Ranaut stunned by ₹1 lakh electricity bill for Manali home: ‘Main rehti bhi nahi hoon’





Source link

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Salman Khan was paid Rs.10 crore more than Govinda for ‘Partner’, reveals writer Alok Upadhyay | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India

Published

on

Salman Khan was paid Rs.10 crore more than Govinda for ‘Partner’, reveals writer Alok Upadhyay | Hindi Movie News – The Times of India


In 2007, Bollywood gave us one of its most-loved comedy films – ‘Partner’. Starring Salman Khan, Govinda, Katrina Kaif and Lara Dutta, the film had everything – laughs, romance, music, and of course, the unbeatable bromance between Salman and Govinda.
Directed by David Dhawan, ‘Partner’ wasn’t just a hit at the box office, but also entertained millions. What happened behind the scenes was just as entertaining. Now, writer Alok Upadhyay has spilled the beans on one particularly funny moment during the shoot of the song ‘Soni De Nakhre’ – and it’s all about two superstars, a choreographer obsessed with legs, and a director who wasn’t having any of it.

Salman and Govinda charged THIS amount for ‘Partner’

By the time ‘Partner’ rolled around, both Salman Khan and Govinda were huge names in the industry. So it’s no surprise that they charged a combined Rs 15 crore for the film, with Salman reportedly getting Rs 10 crore and Govinda Rs 5 crore.
While speaking to the YouTube channel Lightscameramasti, writer Alok Upadhyay praised director David Dhawan’s sharp eye for detail and his control over the entire shoot. Alok said, “He keeps his eyes on everyone simultaneously while shooting and already knows how he’ll edit the scene.”
He also added that David Dhawan’s understanding of commercial cinema was so strong, he could get any actor to do exactly what he wanted. But things didn’t always go smoothly, especially during the shoot of the chartbuster song ‘Soni De Nakhre’.

“15 crore ke actor ki taange dikhaai ja rahi hain”
Alok recalled how Dhawan wasn’t happy when the choreographer kept shooting long shots focusing on the stars’ legs. “David saahab mere paas bethe bolte hain ke ek actor 10 crore le raha hai aur ek 5 crore le raha hai. 15 crore ke actor ki taange dikhaai ja rahi hain, koi matlab to hai nahi.” (David was basically saying, “One actor has charged Rs 10 crore, the other Rs 5 crore, and we’re just showing their legs? What’s the point?”)
That’s when the filmmaker decided to take matters into his own hands and told the choreographer to stop wasting time with decorative shots. He wanted the focus to be on the stars, where it belonged. “Jo 15 crore ke 2 khade hain inka close maar,” David reportedly told the crew. (Get those close-ups of the two leading men, not their knees!). Upadhyay went on to share that David quickly reworked the shot and simply told the actors to do their thing, and the result? One of the most loved dance numbers!

Salman Khan Targeted Again; Explosive Threat Hits Transport Department





Source link

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Not Aishwarya Rai, Kajol was the FIRST choice to play Shah Rukh Khan’s sister in Josh, reveals director Mansoor Khan | – The Times of India

Published

on

Not Aishwarya Rai, Kajol was the FIRST choice to play Shah Rukh Khan’s sister in Josh, reveals director Mansoor Khan | – The Times of India


Mansoor Khan revealed surprising casting choices for his film ‘Josh.’ Shah Rukh Khan was always the first choice for Max, but Aamir Khan initially assumed he would play the role. Kajol declined the sister’s role, wanting to play Max instead. Aishwarya Rai’s professionalism impressed Khan, as she accepted the role without concern for character prominence.

Filmmaker Mansoor Khan, known for hit films like Qayamat Se Qayamat Tak and Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar, recently spoke about the casting of his 2000 movie Josh. In a new interview with PTI, he revealed that the film’s cast could have looked very different. Aamir Khan was first considered to play Aishwarya Rai’s love interest, and Kajol was originally offered the role that later went to Aishwarya. The film eventually starred Shah Rukh Khan and Aishwarya as twins.
Shah Rukh Khan Was Always the First Choice for Max
The director shared that SRK was always his first choice to play the role of Max in Josh. However, when he first discussed the script with Aamir Khan, Aamir assumed he would be cast as Max. Later, when Mansoor approached Shah Rukh with the same role, the actor was enthusiastic. But after realizing that Aamir might be involved, Shah Rukh stepped back from the project, which led to a change in casting plans.Kajol Wanted to Play Max, Not the Sister
Eventually, Shah Rukh came back on board to play Max, while Aamir left the project. But casting challenges continued. When Mansoor Khan offered the role of Max’s twin sister to Kajol—who had already shared blockbuster success with Shah Rukh in films like DDLJ and Kuch Kuch Hota Hai—she surprised him by walking out after the narration. When asked about taking the role, she declined, expressing interest in playing Max instead, as she felt that character carried more charm.

Aishwarya Rai’s Professionalism Sealed the Deal
Things finally fell into place when Mansoor Khan approached Aishwarya for the role. Unlike others, she didn’t focus on which character had more prominence. She appreciated the overall story and agreed to come on board. Her professionalism stood out, and Mansoor believes Josh was one of her finest performances.
The filmmaker highlighted that his casting decisions are guided by conviction rather than commercial appeal. He shared that he doesn’t focus on whether the pairing will be a box-office hit, but instead prioritizes whether he personally believes in the casting choice.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.