Analysis: Myanmar junta seeks legitimacy through a sham election

  • Home
  • World
  • Analysis: Myanmar junta seeks legitimacy through a sham election
World
Analysis: Myanmar junta seeks legitimacy through a sham election


Officials of the Union Election Commission prepare to count votes at a polling station, during the first phase of general election, in Naypyitaw, Myanmar, on December 28, 2025.
| Photo Credit: AP

Close to five years since the February 2021 coup that overturned the Aung San Suu Kyi-led National League for Democracy’s (NLD) landslide electoral victory in the 2020 elections, Myanmar’s military junta, also known as Tatmadaw, is now conducting a three-phase controlled election. The first phase of the “election” was held on December 28 under tight security and saw sparse turnout. Subsequent phases are scheduled for January 11 and 25.

The NLD, whose exiles lead the National Unity Government that oversees Bamar-identity dominated militias called the Peoples’ Defence Forces and is fighting the junta across several parts of the country, was among 40 parties — which accounted for 90% of the seats won in 2020 — that have been barred from contesting. Others include the Arakan National Party in Rakhine and the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy. The junta-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP), packed with former junta officials and active-duty officers contesting as civilians, has deployed the largest number of contestants taking on what is considered just token Opposition.

The junta’s strategy is to repeat what it accomplished in 2010 when it installed its generals as civilian rulers to run a government elected in a similarly restricted election. But the difference now is that this election is occurring amid a brutal civil war, where the junta has bombed its own civilian population and hostilities have resulted in thousands of deaths. Min Aung Hlaing’s men have bare control over just about half the country. In at least 65 townships — close to a third of the total — elections are not being held, with the civil war still raging in many rural outposts. Yet the junta has gone ahead with these controlled polls to win some legitimacy with the international community.

Between 2010 and 2020, the reformist general Thein Sein had allowed for gradual inclusion of leading democratic forces in the polity — leading to international recognition and increased trade and investments — before Min Aung Hlaing pulled the plug through the 2021 coup, resulting in international isolation except for support from Russia, Belarus and a hedging China. Under the 2008 Constitution, the military automatically holds 25% of all parliamentary seats, and with the USDP set to retain a dominant position through proportional representation, the Tatmadaw seeks to control the legislature and provide a legal framework for ending the emergency declared since the coup. This, it believes, will help deepen engagement with partners such as China and Russia.

Recent military advances have also encouraged the junta down this path. In late 2023, a rebel alliance of three ethnic armed organisations (EAOs) — the Three Brotherhood Alliance — forced the junta’s withdrawal from northern Shan State and Rakhine State, adding to blows from other long-term insurgent EAOs such as the Kachins, Karens and Karennis, aided by the PDFs’ guerrilla warfare. The TBA’s advances came with tacit approval from Beijing, frustrated by the junta’s inaction on scam centres near the China border that had caused massive losses to Chinese citizens. But once those scam centres were targeted, China pivoted — pressuring at least two TBA groups to sign ceasefires and surrender townships gained in Shan State, closing border trading routes to enforce compliance while stabilising the junta to protect its geo-economic interests. One TBA member, the Arakan Army, has continued operations in Rakhine State, which shares no border with China, gaining significant territory except urban centres like Sittwe.

On the day of polling, junta jets and artillery attacked residential areas of Budalin township in Sagaing Region; the previous day, nine civilians died in similar attacks in Khin-U township. Besides Russian-supplied jets, the junta now deploys Chinese-made drones and motorised paragliders to attack rebel forces and civilians alike for area dominance. This brutality is unsurprising — Min Aung Hlaing faces ongoing proceedings before both the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice, the latter probing genocide against the Rohingya.

The sparse turnout suggests the junta remains deeply unpopular, and the continuing civil war guarantees instability. Yet the resistance’s lack of a centralised structure uniting Bamar guerrillas with EAOs under NUG command, combined with a shifting geopolitical landscape, suggests the junta will maintain its resilience. Besides Russian, Chinese and Belarusian support, Washington’s stance has grown ambivalent under the Trump administration — U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said last month that Myanmar was progressing towards “free and fair elections” and the Treasury recently lifted sanctions on firms close to the junta leadership, fuelling concerns that rare earth minerals may be trumping democracy promotion. The overall result is strategic stalemate, with over 20 million people requiring humanitarian assistance and no end to the suffering in sight.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *