Connect with us

INDIA

White House Confirms Tariffs Announced On April 2 Will Take Immediate Effect; India & Others Brace For Impact

Published

on

White House Confirms Tariffs Announced On April 2 Will Take Immediate Effect; India & Others Brace For Impact


Several countries, including India, wait in anticipation as United States President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs are set to be announced today. The White House said on Tuesday that highly anticipated tariffs announced by President Donald Trump are set to take effect sooner than some had expected–as in immediately.

It further said that with the announcement of tariffs, Trump will seek to “address decades of unfair trade practices”. According to the White House, the tariffs will be closely watched and studied around the world, including in India, said the White House. 

President Trump has hyped the announcement as “Liberation Day” but has sought to dial down anxiety about it, saying the tariffs will be “more lenient than reciprocal” and “kind.” No details about the breadth and scope of the coming tariffs are available yet.

“Tomorrow, the President will be addressing the decades of unfair trade practices that have ripped our country off and American workers off,” Karoline Levitt, the White House spokesperson, said on Tuesday.

“It has hollowed out our middle class. It has destroyed our heartland, and the President is focused on re-shifting our global economy to ensure that America is once again the manufacturing superpower of the world.”

“Certainly, the president is always up to take a phone call, always up for a good negotiation,” she commented further in response to a question about the potential for negotiations following the announcement. “But he is very much focused on fixing the wrongs of the past and showing that American workers have a fair shake.”

Reports have suggested that discussions among his aides have focused on several options: a 15 percent tax on the Dirty 15” countries and entities, as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has described them — or it could be a universal tariff imposed on all.

A notice in the federal register has identified these countries and entities as possible targets: India, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, and Vietnam.

Trump told reporters Monday some countries have begun dialing down their tariffs in anticipation of the announcement, which, he added, included India and Europe. But, as the spokesperson indicated, the White House is open to talks.

Trump first announced his intention to bring such a tariff system in his inauguration address to end “destructive trade deficits,” and he has since said it will come into effect on April 2 — and not on April 1 before the “April Fool” implications. These tariffs will be over and above those announced by Trump on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China—25 percent for the former and two and 10 percent on the latter — and 25 percent on all imported automobiles and auto parts.

He has not yet offered clues to the size of the upcoming tariffs or the target countries. But President Trump has frequently mentioned India for its tariffs, which he has called “brutal,” and the trade deficit. The US goods trade deficit with India was $45.7 billion in 2024, a 5.4 percent increase ($2.4 billion) over 2023, according to the office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), the top trade negotiator for the US.

Total goods trade between the two countries was an estimated $129.2 billion in 2024. American goods exports to India were $41.8 billion, up 3.4 percent ($1.4 billion) from 2023, and total US goods imports from India totaled $87.4 billion in 2024, up 4.5 percent ($3.7 billion) from 2023.

India and the US have held trade talks in the lead-up to the anticipated reciprocal tariffs, but neither side has divulged details. “I think it’s going to work out very well between India and our country,” he said Friday when asked specifically about trade talks with India.

“I’ll probably be more lenient than reciprocal, because if I was reciprocal, that would be very tough for people,” Trump said in an interview with Newsmax last week. Once again, he offered no details. “I know there are some exceptions, and it’s an ongoing discussion, but not too many, not too many exceptions,” the president added.

While speaking to reporters on Sunday, Trump stated that he’d “settled” on a plan for sweeping new tariffs to be announced midweek, catching some White House officials by surprise: If the president had indeed arrived at a final decision for the tariffs, it hadn’t yet been widely shared inside the building, as per CNN.

Still unclear is whether Trump plans to levy individual tariff rates on all US trading partners, put tariffs on only some countries, or apply a universal tariff—perhaps as high as 20 percent—on all imports. Trump’s advisers are publicly supportive of Trump’s tariff agenda, but they differ in approach and scope behind the scenes.

Meanwhile, recently, Trump said that he had heard that India was dropping its tariffs on American goods substantially. “I think I heard that India just a little while ago is going to be dropping its tariffs very substantially, and I said, Why didn’t somebody do this a long time ago?'” he said.

Trump was asked if his tariffs—which are to be effective from Wednesday—may push countries to side with China, to which he promptly said that the tariffs would actually help the countries do better. He did not explain how that would be.

“No, I’m not worried about it. I think they have a chance of doing better with the tariffs. It can actually help them in a certain way, and I think a lot of them will drop their tariffs because they’ve been unfairly tariffing the United States for years,” he said.

The US President said that the European Union had dropped its tariffs on US-made cars to 2.5 percent. “If you look at the European Union- on cars, the European Union already dropped their tariff down to 2.5 per cent. It was announced a couple of days ago, which is a very small tariff the United States charged,” he said.

Trump will unveil a new tariff plan on April 2, which he has dubbed “Liberation Day,” in his first Rose Garden press conference of his second term, CNN reported.

(With agencies Inputs)



Source link

Continue Reading
Comments

INDIA

Dilip Cherian | ED Extensions and the Curious Case of IPS Tenure ‘Relaxation’

Published

on

Dilip Cherian | ED Extensions and the Curious Case of IPS Tenure ‘Relaxation’



If there’s one thing India’s babus do well, it’s dressing up flexibility as policy. Case in point: The latest extensions given to Sonia Narang and Abhishek Goyal, both senior IPS officers on Central deputation to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Their tenures have been extended in “relaxation” of the IPS tenure policy. Now that’s babu-speak for, “Yes, we made rules. No, we’re not always bound by them.”

Take Ms Narang. In early April, she was relieved from her ED post and sent back to the Karnataka cadre without explanation. And just like that, she’s back in Delhi with a one-year extension. Whiplash, anyone? In her time at ED, she’s handled a whole alphabet soup of high-profile cases — PFI, IFFCO, Vivo, Maoists, even the ever-glamorous Khan Market cash trail. Someone decided she’s too valuable to let go just yet. But observers are wondering why the unceremonious exit earlier?

Mr Goyal’s extension is equally telling. Currently leading the HIU and also handling the Northern Region (including the recently held Maharashtra elections), he, too, gets a one-year bonus round. Perhaps it helps to be where the political action is.

Let’s not forget: The post of special director is the second-highest rank in the ED hierarchy. There are nine of them. That’s a lot of “special” and not a lot of clarity.

So here we are watching the rules bend, twist, and politely look the other way when power and convenience collide. The ACC may call it relaxation. For many others, it’s a masterclass in bureaucratic yoga.

When babus bicker: Kerala’s ‘civil war’ goes public Kerala’s babudom seems to be experiencing its own version of a reality show, complete with public spats, social media drama, and allegations flying faster than monsoon winds.

At the centre of this storm is IAS officer N. Prasanth, affectionately dubbed “Collector Bro” for his social media savvy. Currently suspended, Mr Prasanth has accused senior bureaucrats A. Jayathilak and K. Gopalakrishnan of corruption and conspiracy, even dragging a Malayalam daily into the fray. He claims his suspension is retaliation for whistleblowing against entrenched corruption and misuse of office — serious charges that can’t just be brushed off.

Meanwhile, Mr Gopalakrishnan was suspended for allegedly creating a religion-based WhatsApp group, seen as a violation of service rules. Mr Prasanth’s own suspension followed his very public criticism of Jayathilak on social media, which the government called a breach of conduct. The online slugfest has exposed the cracks within Kerala’s famously disciplined administrative set-up.

This bureaucratic brawl isn’t just about bruised egos; it reflects deeper dysfunction within the administrative framework. The public airing of such disputes, especially on social media, undermines the integrity of the civil services and erodes public trust. And let’s not forget, it’s also a massive distraction from governance.

In an era where transparency is paramount, perhaps it’s time for the babus to embrace openness and address internal conflicts through proper institutional channels. After all, the public deserves a civil service that is as accountable as it is efficient and less prone to becoming an OTT-worthy drama.

MP babus bear transparency burden, not ministers In the power corridors of Madhya Pradesh, a silent discontent brews among babus. While IAS, IPS, and IFS officers are mandated to disclose their immovable assets annually, ministers have sidestepped this transparency for over 15 years. The contrast is as stark as it is telling, and although no one dares say it out loud, the resentment is palpable.

The state’s general administration department has reiterated that all state employees must submit detailed property disclosures. This includes information on ancestral and self-acquired properties, purchase dates, values, and current market valuations. Non-compliance could result in withheld salaries or stalled promotions — a stiff penalty for mere delay, let alone defiance.

In contrast, ministers have largely avoided such scrutiny. Despite previous commitments, including a 2016 announcement to declare assets online, many ministers have not consistently disclosed their property details. Successive governments have either quietly ignored the issue or kicked the can down the road, possibly to avoid ruffling political feathers.

This discrepancy fosters a sense of inequity among bureaucrats, who are held to stringent standards while political leaders operate with relative impunity. The whisper in government circles is not about whether this is unfair but how long this double standard will continue.

The lack of ministerial transparency undermines the principles of accountability and good governance. For a truly transparent administration, it’s imperative that ministers lead by example, embracing the same disclosure standards imposed on bureaucrats.

Until then, babus will keep filing their disclosures under silent protest, watching their political bosses sail above the accountability tide, dry, untouched, and remarkably unbothered.



Source link

Continue Reading

INDIA

Pahalgam Terror Attack: Give Them The War They Want, Netizens Demand Israel-Like Action Against Pakistan

Published

on

Pahalgam Terror Attack: Give Them The War They Want, Netizens Demand Israel-Like Action Against Pakistan


Pahalgam Terror Attack: Terrorists from Pakistan and their local aides struck at a prime tourist location in Pahalgam in Kashmir on Tuesday, killing at least 26 people, mostly tourists, and injuring several others. The terror attack has sent shockwaves across the world with condolences pouring in from global leaders. The political parties have extended their support to the government seeking action against Pakistan.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, NSA Ajit Doval, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and other senior officials participated in the Cabinet Committee of Security to discuss the situation emanating from the attack. 

On the other hand, the social media is abuzz with reactions and condolences. Netizens are demanding strict action against Pakistan with some calling for another surgical strike while others want India to do the same to Pakistan that Israel did to Hamas. 

“India Must Learn From Israel,” said a social media user.

Another user said, “You did everything you could to make peace with. Now Go, give them the war they want.”

“We need revenge Modiji,” said other user.

“The terrorists came out of nowhere and started attacking innocent citizens. What Israel did to Palestine, India should do to Pakistan,” said other user.

The Cabinet Committee on Security discusses and debates defence policy, expenditure, and all matters of national security for India. It is the highest decision-making body for appointing heads of national security agencies, as well.

The meeting included top leaders, including Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, and External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, who were part of the committee. The National Security Advisor, Cabinet Secretary, and Defence Secretary also attend the meetings.





Source link

Continue Reading

INDIA

MP urges Railway Board to approve doubling of Villupuram-Thanjavur section

Published

on

MP urges Railway Board to approve doubling of Villupuram-Thanjavur section


D. Ravikumar. File
| Photo Credit: T. Singaravelou

Villupuram Member of Parliament D. Ravikumar has urged the Railway Board to approve the detailed project report (DPR) for the doubling of the Villupuram-Thanjavur section, with some variations.

Mr. Ravikumar placed this demand before the Southern Railway, as a follow-up to the annual meeting of the Southern Railway with Members of Parliament in Trichy on Wednesday (April 23, 2025) to discuss railway-related developmental activities, issues, and passenger amenities.

In a letter addressed to the Southern Railway General Manager, Mr. Ravikumar pointed out that the trains being operated on this section run with high occupancy rate. The occupancy of Villupuram-Cuddalore is 82% and Cuddalore-Mayiladuthurai is 91%, he said.

Stating that the route also witnessed heavy freight movement, providing more revenue to the Railways, he said that priority should be given to the doubling work. The MP also urged the Railway administration to hold consultations with the State government and provide alternate housing for families who had built houses near the Villupuram junction and Valavanur station.

He said that a notice was issued to the residents asking them to vacate the land owned by the Railways, as the administration had leased it to private individuals on a long-term basis. The residents have filed a case and obtained an injunction against the railway administration’s order.

Asking these long-term residents to vacate without providing alternative accommodation is unacceptable. The administration should consult the State government to ensure these families are provided with alternate housing, he said.

Mr. Ravikumar’s letter also contained demands for providing escalator facilities at Villupuram junction; introduction of EMU services at Villupuram; stoppage of Tejas Express at Villupuram; additional coaches for Puducherry to Madras Express; introduction of battery cards at the Tirukoyilur and Uludurpet platforms; passenger amenities at Ulundurpet, Tindivanam, and Tirukoyilur stations; stoppage of Tirupati-Rameswaram Express; priority for local residents in leasing railway property; and revival of special fares for senior citizens and journalists.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.