Connect with us

Technology

Science for all newsletter How bird songs have evolved?

Published

on

Science for all newsletter How bird songs have evolved?


(This article forms a part of the Science for All newsletter that takes the jargon out of science and puts the fun in! Subscribe now!) 

Birds have long fascinated scientists and nature lovers alike with the rich variety of sounds they produce. From melodic songs to sharp alarm calls, bird vocalisations serve a variety of purposes, including attracting mates, defending territory, and communicating with others. However, the underlying factors that drive the incredible diversity of bird sounds have remained poorly understood — until now.

A new study conducted by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has provided new insights into why birds make certain sounds and at what frequency. Published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the research analyses the environmental and biological factors influencing bird vocalisations. The study, led by H.S. Sathya Chandra Sagar, a doctoral student, analysed over 100,000 bird sound recordings from around the world. The recordings represented 77% of all known bird species, offering a comprehensive understanding of global patterns in bird communication.

The research highlighted several important factors influencing bird vocalisations, including habitat, latitude, body size, and beak shape. These factors not only shape how birds communicate but also reflect broader evolutionary and ecological patterns.

One of the most surprising discoveries was the relationship between a bird’s habitat and the frequency of its sounds. In ecosystems with a lot of background noise — such as those with rushing water or dense vegetation — birds tend to produce higher-frequency sounds. This adaptation likely helps them avoid being drowned out by low-frequency environmental noise, allowing their calls to remain distinct. 

The study also uncovered a geographic pattern in bird vocalisations. Bird species living at similar latitudes tend to produce similar types of sounds across the globe, suggesting that environmental conditions linked to latitude — such as climate — play a significant role in shaping bird communication. 

The size and shape of a bird’s body and beak also affect the sounds it produces. Smaller birds will generate higher-frequency sounds, while larger birds produce lower-frequency calls. This is consistent with physical principles — smaller vocal cords and shorter beaks are better suited for creating high-pitched sounds, while larger body mass and longer beaks favour deeper tones. 

The analysis further found that smaller birds have a wider range of sound frequencies. This flexibility could be an evolutionary adaptation to improve survival. Higher-pitched calls may help them communicate within their species, while lower-frequency sounds could serve as a form of camouflage. By mimicking the deeper tones of larger birds, smaller species may confuse predators and reduce their chances of being targeted.

Beyond improving the understanding of bird communication, the study also has significant implications for conservation. Bird vocalisations are a key component of “soundscapes” — the total collection of sounds in a particular environment. According to Sagar, understanding the structure of soundscapes can help scientists monitor the health of ecosystems.

For example, the decline of larger birds due to hunting could be reflected in the absence of low-frequency calls in a given habitat. If soundscapes in tropical forests or other biodiverse areas show a reduction in low-frequency sounds, it could signal overhunting or environmental degradation.

This study from the University of Wisconsin-Madison sheds new light on the complex factors that shape bird sounds. By revealing how habitat, geography, and physical traits influence bird vocalisations, the research provides a deeper understanding of avian communication and opens new doors for conservation and ecological monitoring.

From the Science pages

Question Corner

Flora and fauna



Source link

Continue Reading
Comments

Technology

The Science Quiz: Mathematical puzzles

Published

on

The Science Quiz: Mathematical puzzles


The Science Quiz: Mathematical puzzles

1 / 6 |
Visual: Name the game whose starting setup is shown here. The point is to move the entire stack of disks to another pole, one at a time, but at no point allowing a larger disk to sit atop a smaller one.



Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Google One: What happens to your data after you cancel subscription

Published

on

Google One: What happens to your data after you cancel subscription


Google account holders receive 15GB of free cloud storage, which is shared across Gmail, Google Drive, Google Photos, and other services. For users who need more space, Google One subscription plans offer expanded storage starting at 100GB. But what happens if you cancel your plan while using more than the free 15GB?

Upon cancellation, your account storage limit returns to 15GB. (Google)

Your storage reverts, but data isn’t deleted immediately

Upon cancellation, your account storage limit returns to 15GB. If your usage is above that threshold — for example, if you had 100GB of data stored — your account will enter a restricted state:

Gmail: You will no longer be able to send or receive emails.

Drive: Uploading new files and folders will be blocked.

Google Docs/Sheets/Slides: You won’t be able to create new documents.

Photos: New photo and video backups will stop.

Premium features (like advanced support or Gemini AI access) will be removed.

Existing files remain accessible

Importantly, your existing data remains intact and accessible. Google does not immediately delete files stored in Drive, Gmail, or Photos. You can still view, download, and delete content as needed, even if you are over the storage limit.

Two-year grace period

According to Google’s official policy, if your account stays over the storage limit for two years, Google may begin deleting your data. Users are given this extended grace period to either reduce storage or re-subscribe.

Your options

If you’re over the limit and want to continue using Google services without restrictions, you have two main options:

Resubscribe to Google One: Restores storage and full functionality immediately.

Reduce storage usage: Delete files, emails, or media to bring your account under 15GB. Once below the limit, full access is restored to Gmail, Drive, and Photos.

No immediate action needed

If you don’t plan to actively use Gmail or upload new files, you can keep your data stored as-is. However, if your storage stays above 15GB, you’ll need to manage or migrate your files before the two-year limit to avoid automatic deletion.

Mobile Finder: Motorola Edge 60 Pro launched in India” rel=”dofollow”>Mobile Finder: Motorola Edge 60 Pro launched in India



Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

1,000-foot UFO image sparks debate: Alien truth or optical illusion? – The Times of India

Published

on

1,000-foot UFO image sparks debate: Alien truth or optical illusion? – The Times of India


A new photo claiming to show a massive, 1,000-foot-wide UFO hovering above the American Southwest has been released by UFO disclosure activists, and immediately ridiculed by critics who say the “craft” looks more like farmland than flying saucer, reported the New York Post.
The image was presented by controversial former Pentagon insider Luis “Lue” Elizondo during a UAP Disclosure Fund panel on Thursday in Washington, DC The event, titled Science, National Security & Innovation, featured several US lawmakers and scientists and aimed to push for full declassification of UFO data held by the government.
“Captured near Four Corners at FL210, estimated 600–1,000 ft in diameter, silver-hued, disc-shaped,” read the accompanying caption posted by the UAP Disclosure Fund on X.
The photo, reportedly taken by a commercial airline pilot in 2021, appears to show a silvery disc casting a large shadow on the Earth below.
Elizondo said the image was taken with a “civilian-grade” camera and noted he “could not vouch for the veracity of this photograph, because I didn’t take it.” Still, he pointed to the visible shadow as evidence that the object had physical presence.
The group also claimed “several speakers confirmed DoD & IC hold hundreds of similar UAP images + sensor files still classified.”
But online sleuths weren’t impressed. Prominent UFO skeptic Mick West led the backlash, arguing the “saucer” is likely just a set of circular crop irrigation fields, common in desert regions, and said the shadows in nearby hills contradict the claim of a flying object casting its own.
Elizondo has previously faced criticism for presenting “evidence” of UFOs that turned out to be misidentified or debunked, and the Pentagon has distanced itself from many of his past claims.
The panel included Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.), Congressman Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), and Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb. One panelist, nuclear physicist Eric Davis, went further, claiming Earth has been visited by four alien species: “grays,” “Nordics,” “reptilian,” and “insectoid.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 Republic Diary. All rights reserved.